Architecture is decided by which ISO you downloaded.
Suggest checking if you have the multiarch-support package, ie you
could try
apt-get install multiarch-support
dpkg --add-architecture amd64
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade (essential to add multi-lib supp
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Joel Roth wrote:
> I installed devuan following dev1fanboy's guide and ended up with an amd64
> kernel and i386 package binaries.
>
> First of all, I'm curious if those choices are explicit in the installer.
> (I thought had I asked for amd64.)
Nope! The 64 bit i
Hi Rainer,
I added cmake, which generates the makefile:
https://gitlab.com/aitor_czr/spinner/commits/master
How to build:
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../
make
On the other hand, adding '-export-dynamic' to 'gcc', removes the
following warnings:
[...]
(spinner:8867): Gtk-WARNING **: Could n
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:16:05PM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> I added cmake, which generates the makefile:
>
> https://gitlab.com/aitor_czr/spinner/commits/master
>
> How to build:
>
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake ../
> make
>
Again, sorry for playing auldie auntie, but why on
Hi KatolaZ,
I agree with you: using "cd build; cmake ../" with *the final purpose*
of installing the spinner in the system is a contorsionism.
Although any user on planet Earth will install the spinner in any OS.
With or without systemd.
But, what happen in the case of a developer? For each
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi KatolaZ,
>
> I agree with you: using "cd build; cmake ../" with *the final purpose* of
> installing the spinner in the system is a contorsionism.
>
> Although any user on planet Earth will install the spinner in any OS. With or
> without sy
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
aitor_czr writes:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> I added cmake, which generates the makefile:
>
> https://gitlab.com/aitor_czr/spinner/commits/master
>
> How to build:
>
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake ../
> make
In case this wasn't plain enough: You shouldn't just use C++ because
some C++ user is convinced t
Rainer Weikusat writes:
[...]
> -
> .PHONY: clean
>
> spinner: spinner.cpp
> g++ -o $@ $< `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtkmm-3.0`
>
> clean:
> -rm spinner
>
>
> So, until things get much more complicated, why not just use make?
Some more advocacy for Seriously Underu
On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
I agree with you: using "cd build; cmake ../" with *the final purpose* of
installing the spinner in the system is a contorsionism.
Not really, it's directly analogous to VPATH builds with make (and
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:04:41PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
> >On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> >>I agree with you: using "cd build; cmake ../" with *the final purpose* of
> >>installing the spinner in the system is a contorsionism.
Hi Roger,
On 26/11/15 18:05, Roger Leigh wrote:
It lets you cleanly separate source and build (and have multiple build trees).
It
also makes cleaning the build tree nothing more than removing the build
tree.
Yes, and thas a good thing...
... Because then you can add the 'build' folder to
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:04 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> > >
> > Hi, what's wrong with plain GNU make, and the GNU auto-tools?
>
> Nothing is wrong with "plain make", providing that it meets your n
aitor_czr writes:
> On 26/11/15 18:05, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> It lets you cleanly separate source and build (and have multiple build
>> trees). It
>> also makes cleaning the build tree nothing more than removing the build
>> tree.
>>
>
> Yes, and thas a good thing...
>
> ... Because then you c
On 26/11/2015 17:16, KatolaZ wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:04:41PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
I agree with you: using "cd build; cmake ../" with *the final purpose* of
installing the spinner in th
On 26/11/2015 17:53, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:04 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
Hi, what's wrong with plain GNU make, and the GNU auto-tools?
Nothing is wrong with "plain make",
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 07:14:35PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
[cut]
>
> That's correct. You can put the build directory anywhere you like.
> But, you do need to chdir to the build directory before running
> "cmake /path/to/source", just as you do when running
> "/path/to/configure" with autoconf
On 26/11/2015 20:02, KatolaZ wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 07:14:35PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
[cut]
That's correct. You can put the build directory anywhere you like.
But, you do need to chdir to the build directory before running
"cmake /path/to/source", just as you do when running
"/pat
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 19:36 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 26/11/2015 17:53, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:04 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > Hi, what's wro
Svante Signell writes:
> On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 19:36 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On 26/11/2015 17:53, Svante Signell wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 17:04 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > > On 26/11/2015 15:00, Svante Signell wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:33 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
>>
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:50 +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Svante Signell writes:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 19:36 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > Well, as long as you work with configure.ac, Makefile.am and confiugre.h.in
> > level for files you won't have any problems with make/autotools. The
Hi all,
I think the subject makes my question clear enough, but I'll provide
some background. The x86_64 machine I'm currently using as a
router/freenet node/i2p node has some components which are on the
brink of failing, the mobo seems to be one of those. So, I'm looking
at what to replace it with
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 09:31:21PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think the subject makes my question clear enough, but I'll provide
> some background. The x86_64 machine I'm currently using as a
> router/freenet node/i2p node has some components which are on the
> brink of failing, the
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:36:12PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I'm curious about the use as a router. How many physical net
> connections can a raspberry pi have?
From what I read, the 2nd generation B has one 10/100 ethernet port
which is a network card on one of the pi's usb ports. Besides th
On 27 November 2015 at 06:31, Gregory Nowak wrote:
>
> I was planning to get a serial cable for the pi, so I can do
> console=ttyS0,115200 to be able to interact with it from boot to shutdown,
> but saw no mention anywhere of being able to do this, so I probably
> won't get the cable. Being blind
Le 26/11/2015 17:12, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
In case this wasn't plain enough: You shouldn't just use C++ because
some C++ user is convinced that writing anything in another programming
language must be a grievious error. They're all concinved of that and
for that matter, if you're only tool is
26 matches
Mail list logo
