Le 31/05/2015 22:34, Laurent Bercot a écrit :
On 31/05/2015 18:35, Didier Kryn wrote:
AFAIU, this thread has turned to be about interfacing whatever app to
a scripting language. I consider this a very usefull feature for all
but basic applications. In particular, I consider that interfacing
init
On 01/06/2015 11:25, Didier Kryn wrote:
I know the argument that init should be kept small to be rock-solid.
Does it mean that it must be written in C and not in Lua or Ash?
It all depends on what you call "init". This word encompasses at
least three different things. Explanation and details h
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:25:03 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> I know the argument that init should be kept small to be
> rock-solid. Does it mean that it must be written in C and not in Lua
> or Ash?
Yes. In my opinion it does. Init must be tiny, and it must be rock
solid. Lu
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:11:08 +0800
Robert Storey wrote:
> Now that Ubuntu and Debian have decided to go over to the Dark Side
> (ie systemd), I've been looking for a replacement at least until
> Devuan is released. I believe it was Steve Litt who made a post
> suggesting that Manjaro-OpenRC was ve
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Storey"
>
> First, thanks to all who replied.
>
> To me, the ideal solution would be if this was a user-configurable option.
> Would be great if you could, for example, just stick something into .bashrc
> for any user to allow automounting of USB devi
Le 01/06/2015 12:59, Laurent Bercot a écrit :
Oh, sure - I'm all for learning by experimenting and hacking away.
It's just that this mailing-list is about a distribution that aims
to be Debian-sized, so I thought you were suggesting it for Devuan.
I think you'll agree that on a distribution, st
On 2015-06-01 16:22, Rob Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Storey"
First, thanks to all who replied.
To me, the ideal solution would be if this was a user-configurable
option.
Would be great if you could, for example, just stick something into
.bashrc
for any user to a
On 2015-05-31 01:21, Init Freedom wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cdEFF-ttLw [1]
May the source be with you, gents.
Links:
--
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cdEFF-ttLw
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyn
On Sun, 31 May 2015, Yves wrote:
>Damn I find this distasteful!!
agreed, however we must consider that another hitler video was done
against us even before we had the chance to follow up from the
declaration with present facts and even if the "german dictator type" is
obviously not sitting in
- Original Message -
> From: "shraptor"
> On 2015-06-01 16:22, Rob Owens wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Robert Storey"
> >>
> >> First, thanks to all who replied.
> >>
> >> To me, the ideal solution would be if this was a user-configurable
> >> option.
> >> Would be
> After more digging, what did the problem turn out to be?
>
>
> policykit-1. Yup, during my upgrade, I snagged policykit-1 from
> Devuan. It broke things.
>
> I apt-get remove'd policykit-1, and lookit that, my Reboot/Shutdown
> buttons are back. I didn't even have to restart XFCE.
>
>
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS
It seems udev is getting split up between several projects within systemd and
GNOME. It seems gudev is being handed off in the future to GNOME and parts of
udev are being pushed deeper into systemd.
I'm not surprised at this, since kdbus didn'
Hi Jim,
> It seems udev is getting split up between several projects within systemd
> and GNOME. It seems gudev is being handed off in the future to GNOME and
> parts of udev are being pushed deeper into systemd.
>
>
gudev splitting off isn't a problem; in fact, I applaud the decision.
> I'm no
One concern I have is how GNOME will manage gudev. One thing I don't want to
think about is them creating some dependency upon systemd in some way
preventing portability to extracted udev or something that is udev compatible
like vdev requiring gudev to be either heavily patched or redeveloped,
14 matches
Mail list logo
