On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> I've just released libsysdev 0.1.0.
> Source code may be found at:
> https://github.com/idunham/libsysdev/archive/0.1.0.tar.gz
> (I'll have to tag releases using a different approach.)
>
> There's an initial port of xf86-input-evdev t
Hi all,
Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
___
Dng
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Steve Litt wrote:
> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>
> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> SteveT
>
I'm sure you know it already, but it is definitely worth pointing out
the classic LILO is still maintained:
http://ker
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Philip Keogh wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> >
> > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
> >
> > SteveT
> >
>
> I'm sure you know it already, but it is definitely worth po
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 17:39 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>
> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
So, what's the problem with grub?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@li
Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>
> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
GRUB is brilliant, and complicated. I recently had an issue
with update-grub hanging on trying to read from a swap
partition, or some such. E
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 02:54:12PM -0800, Philip Keogh wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Philip Keogh wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Steve Litt wrote:
> > > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 17:39 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>>
>> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> So, what's the problem with grub?
>
Even
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:39:28PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>
> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> SteveT
Besides (e)lilo, there's (sys|ext|iso)linux and grub4dos-chenall.
grub4dos is a supers
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:19:55 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 17:39 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> >
> > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> So, what's the problem with gru
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:46:01 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> >
> > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> GRUB is brilliant, and complicated. I recently had an issue
> with upda
Steve, to my knowledge, in Debian, there aren't any dependencies on
any bootloader that aren't for configuration tools, so unlike systemd
you can replace it at will. in fact, i'm pretty sure you can
completely remove all bootloader related packages and use something
else completely.
That said, th
On Fri,On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Steve Litt wrote:
> Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
>
> I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
>
> SteveT
>
I'm sure you know it already, but it is definitely worth pointing out
the classic LILO is still maintained
Though
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 08:09:56PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:46:01 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders
Steve Litt wrote:
> Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 17:39 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is it just me, or is Grub2 as complex and error prone as systemd?
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we can have alternate boot loaders.
> >
> > So, what's the problem with
15 matches
Mail list logo