On 24/12/14 02:23, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> Instead of digesting for you the week on the mailing list, I want you to
> think carefully and say if Devuan Weekly News
>
> a) is useful
> b) should be coordinated with such announcements
The way I see it, DWN provides a synopsis of what happ
I was late to the main discussion, but i want show you intresting
thoughts from one of the oldest DD:
http://blog.liw.fi/posts/debian-developing-it-wrong/
Some items (deb-internals related) very hard to implement without
partly/complete loss of compatibility.
* smart build tools
* debian/rules cl
Hello list,
I was pleased a few days ago to read about Devuan.
I don't fully understand the nature of the furure that has grown up
around systemd but diversity in the Linux gene-pool has only to be a
good thing. And developers that contribute significant amounts of time
and effort don't deserve
Dear Freedom lovers,
i would suggest to you this project
https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse
and would say thank for your efforts.
Cheers, and Happy Grav'Mass!
Mike
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
+1 for apulse. It's proven stable enough for Skype calls in my (limited)
experience with it, which is the only reason I would have had for
installing PulseAudio (ideally I'd avoid Skype altogether, but it's
required for $DAYJOB).
-Jude
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:13 PM, m_maass wrote:
> Dear Fr
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:26:10PM -0500, Jude Nelson wrote:
> +1 for apulse. It's proven stable enough for Skype calls in my (limited)
> experience with it, which is the only reason I would have had for
> installing PulseAudio (ideally I'd avoid Skype altogether, but it's
> required for $DAYJOB).
I'm not that worried about the fact that the author considers it "done."
It's not like you have to oil it and give it tune-ups to keep it working ;)
Fortunately, it's not that complex of a program--if any incompatibilities
or bugs are discovered down the road, it shouldn't take much effort to fix
On 12/23/2014 11:44 PM, Jude Nelson wrote:
Hi T.J., sorry this is late--this thread got lost in my inbox.
Thank you for your feedback regarding GPLv3. My reason for choosing
it was because it explicitly grants an irrevocable patent license to
downstream coders, whereas GPLv2 does not. I woul
On 12/24/2014 11:13 AM, m_maass wrote:
Dear Freedom lovers,
i would suggest to you this project
https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse
and would say thank for your efforts.
Cheers, and Happy Grav'Mass!
What is wrong with PulseAudio? I agree, it can be a PITA, but unless
you are concerned about
Thanks Alex! That is _exactly_ some of what I was grousing about.
On 12/24/2014 8:16 AM, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
I was late to the main discussion, but i want show you intresting
thoughts from one of the oldest DD:
http://blog.liw.fi/posts/debian-developing-it-wrong/
Some items (deb-internals
All text below is IMHO.
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 2.0-6.1
<...>
Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.24.1), libc6 (>= 2.9), libcap2 (>= 2.10),
libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libfftw3-3, libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libice6 (>=
1:1.0.0), libltdl7 (>= 2.4.2), liborc-0.4-0 (>= 1:0.4.16), libpulse0 (=
2.0-6.1), libsample
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 04:45:01PM -0600, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> What is wrong with PulseAudio? I agree, it can be a PITA, but
> unless you are concerned about some kind of systemd dependency I do
> not understand why Devuan would be seeking a replacement. It's no
> worse than Jack or any of the o
On 12/24/2014 5:58 PM, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
All text below is IMHO.
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 2.0-6.1
<...>
Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.24.1), libc6 (>= 2.9), libcap2 (>= 2.10),
libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libfftw3-3, libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libice6 (>=
1:1.0.0), libltdl7 (>= 2.4.2), liborc-0.4-
On 12/24/2014 6:48 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
I think it's better to think about what do we get to gain and what to lose
from pulseaudio.
Gains:
* ability to reroute streams mid-run (like, speakers->headphones), but only
if they are connected to physically separate sound cards
* a common way t
Thanks, T.J., for an insightful observation. I'm running a Wheezy based
distro at present planning to stay with it until a more lasting solution
comes along.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dn
On 12/24/2014 8:30 PM, Richard wrote:
Thanks, T.J., for an insightful observation. I'm running a Wheezy
based distro at present planning to stay with it until a more lasting
solution comes along.
I still have Wheezy myself. Given what has been going on with Debian,
I've taken it on mysel
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:08:57PM -0600, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> >Package: pulseaudio
> > 1st group-
> >libsystemd-daemon0 (>= 31), libsystemd-login0 (>= 31),
> You can compile up to at least PA 4 without any references to
> systemd. I should know, I've personally backported to Whe
T.J. Duchene wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> >I think it's better to think about what do we get to gain and what to lose
> >from pulseaudio.
> >Problems:
> > * likes to take 100% of a CPU core for no obvious reasons
> Older versions, yes. There is also the fact that is more than just one
> laye
On 12/24/2014 9:44 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
Hi T.J.,
Do you have reference for that?
Not directly, Joel. What I remember is reading about race
considerations on Wheezy. There were warnings that improper setups
could cause lockups with 100% CPU. Maybe you can start there if you
really want to
+10!
Currently, that pulseaudio thing consumes ~7% of my CPU while I'm not
playing a single song!!
Poettering job, right?! tsc...tsc...
Also, I don't use Skype, so, I don't mind to stick only with Alsa, if
I can use VLC, that's fine... :-)
Nevertheless, it is good to know that Skype works wit
20 matches
Mail list logo
