Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread dev1fanboy
I reckon so too, will sort it out then. Thanks for helping me figure out the problem. Cheers, chillfan On Sunday, February 7, 2016 7:57 PM, shraptor wrote: > On 2016-02-07 20:38, dev1fanboy wrote: >> Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the >> port. Maybe this behav

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread shraptor
On 2016-02-07 20:38, dev1fanboy wrote: Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the port. Maybe this behaviour is okay, e.g someone would normally use only one at a time, or otherwise change the port. Anyone have any thoughts on that? If it doesn't seem like the right beh

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread dev1fanboy
Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the port. Maybe this behaviour is okay, e.g someone would normally use only one at a time, or otherwise change the port. Anyone have any thoughts on that? If it doesn't seem like the right behaviour I could try to change the defaul

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread shraptor
Turns out both can work on debian jessie, so can't fix this unless there is a patch somewhere. Do you mean both transmission-gtk and transmission-daemon ? I tested some more and if you define another port than default then you can run transmission-gtk and transmission-daemon at the same time.

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi, I suggest you do some software analysis for: a) libraries b) functions exported by these libraries c) functions imported by the executable you are interested in running. This way you should be a able to determine which function/s are linked to from dbus and/or systemd. There are CLI tools fo

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread dev1fanboy
Turns out both can work on debian jessie, so can't fix this unless there is a patch somewhere. Cheers, chillfan On Sunday, February 7, 2016 3:41 PM, dev1fanboy wrote: > Thanks for confirming, after your last reply I tried from source and after > tinking with the flags to match the ones by de

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread dev1fanboy
Thanks for confirming, after your last reply I tried from source and after tinking with the flags to match the ones by debian, I found the same thing you just mentioned. It's when transmission-daemon is started that transmission-gtk (or qt) won't work and the reason seems to be transmission-daem

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-07 Thread shraptor
On 2016-02-07 03:26, shraptor wrote: On 2016-02-06 17:18, dev1fanboy wrote: So I am trying to build transmission-daemon without systemd, was just testing this locally and run into an issue. It can be built without systemd but transmission-gtk will no longer start downloading torrents. I think i

Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-06 Thread shraptor
On 2016-02-06 17:18, dev1fanboy wrote: So I am trying to build transmission-daemon without systemd, was just testing this locally and run into an issue. It can be built without systemd but transmission-gtk will no longer start downloading torrents. I think it is down to this error which appears