On 10/01/16 05:15, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
> On 09/01/16 03:23 AM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>>
>> On 09/01/16 21:15, Jaromil wrote:
>>> dear Clarke,
>>>
>>> thanks for the notice
>>>
>>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
>>>
It looks like the choice loss and changes creep on.
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
>I have cloned the kbd git from kernel.org and will give it a look over.
>I have also subscribed to the kbd list at alt.linux.org
>That should get me more of a handle on what is happening upstream and what
>kind of a commitment would be ne
On 09/01/16 03:23 AM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
On 09/01/16 21:15, Jaromil wrote:
dear Clarke,
thanks for the notice
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
It looks like the choice loss and changes creep on.
It popped up on my sid/ceres/no-systemd box today:
kbd (2.0.3-2) unstab
On 09/01/16 21:15, Jaromil wrote:
>
> dear Clarke,
>
> thanks for the notice
>
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
>
>>It looks like the choice loss and changes creep on.
>>It popped up on my sid/ceres/no-systemd box today:
>>
>> kbd (2.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>>
>>
dear Clarke,
thanks for the notice
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Clarke Sideroad wrote:
>It looks like the choice loss and changes creep on.
>It popped up on my sid/ceres/no-systemd box today:
>
> kbd (2.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
>The kbd init script is no longer supported. If con
