On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:36:22 +0200, mdn wrote in message
<59c30986@openmailbox.org>:
> Le 21/09/2017 00:53, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:55:47 +0200, mdn wrote in message
> > <59c2e3e3.6010...@openmailbox.org>:
> >
> >> Le 20/09/2017 22:26, airmoose a écrit :
> >>> Sinc
Le 21/09/2017 00:53, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:55:47 +0200, mdn wrote in message
> <59c2e3e3.6010...@openmailbox.org>:
>
>> Le 20/09/2017 22:26, airmoose a écrit :
>>> Since there is currently some discussion about Chrome/Chromium
>>> security concerns, is Vivaldi (based o
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:55:47 +0200, mdn wrote in message
<59c2e3e3.6010...@openmailbox.org>:
> Le 20/09/2017 22:26, airmoose a écrit :
> > Since there is currently some discussion about Chrome/Chromium
> > security concerns, is Vivaldi (based on Chromium code I understand)
> > also affected with
Quoting airmoose (airmo...@velo-circus.com):
> Since there is currently some discussion about Chrome/Chromium
> security concerns, is Vivaldi (based on Chromium code I understand)
> also affected with the same security issues?
It's proprietary. Thus, it's the sponsoring company's black box where
Le 20/09/2017 22:26, airmoose a écrit :
> Since there is currently some discussion about Chrome/Chromium security
> concerns, is Vivaldi (based on Chromium code I understand) also affected
> with the same security issues?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)
https://vivaldi.com/priva
