Re: [DNG] Life After Firefox 56

2017-02-24 Thread ael
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:36:24AM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 24/02/2017 03:31, Rick Moen a écrit : > > , but Pale Moon looks pretty interesting: anybodyhere use it? > > My conclusion is that the software is satisfactory but the maintainance > isn't, not knowing if the problem is > upstrea

Re: [DNG] Life After Firefox 56

2017-02-24 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 24/02/2017 03:31, Rick Moen a écrit : , but Pale Moon looks pretty interesting: anybodyhere use it? I installed it on two Devuan-Jessie machines. I installed the Zync (or some name like this) extension to switch language ,and the French language extension. I'm satisfied with it, but I

Re: [DNG] Life After Firefox 56

2017-02-23 Thread Rick Moen
As it turns out, Firefox-ESR is, per Mozilla documentation, _also_ not going to absolutely enforce Mozilla, Inc. signing of extensions. This matter was raised by the estimable Akkana Peck, who was a frequent speaker at our local Silicon Valley Linux User Group meetings before moving to New Mexico

Re: [DNG] Life After Firefox 56

2017-02-23 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting goli...@dyne.org (goli...@dyne.org): > Lockdown/branding is not just happening to the desktop. We've known > for some time that the Firefox we've loved for over a decade is > about to suffer a similar fate. Those that like to pimp out their > browser (like me) will find this Mozillazine

Re: [DNG] Life After Firefox 56

2017-02-23 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, Well, yes, I am disappointed that they want to give up on Thunderbird too. More below. On 24/02/17 03:01, goli...@dyne.org wrote: > Lockdown/branding is not just happening to the desktop. We've known for > some time that the Firefox we've loved for over a decade is about to > suffer a simil