Il giorno giovedì 14/03/2019 23:23:52 +0100
Edward Bartolo ha scritto:
> I have a raspberry Pi with a Pi DAC Pro sound for which there is no
> driver installed. Searching online takes me to readily prepared
> operating system images that I do not want to use as I am using
> Devuan. Does anyone kn
don't use any sound on rpi, but some searching online, pointed here :
http://www.iqaudio.com/downloads/IQaudIO.pdf
(check p.31. )
On 3/15/19 12:23 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
> I have a raspberry Pi with a Pi DAC Pro sound for which there is no
> driver installed. Searching online takes me
I found a way that seems ok:
I installed Raspbian Stretch and migrated it to Devuan Ascii.
The package raspberrypi-kernel is in
"http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ stretch main", so i left this in
my sources list, but pinned it with priority 200, so no other packages
are installed by accide
Am 06.02.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Jaromil:
> The main reasons why Devuan acts like Debian in this case is that in
> Jessie we only operate to remove systemd, nothing else changes, while
> we still rely heavily on Debian for the bulk of binary builds.
>
Ok, I see it's Debians fault for the improper ar
dear Jochen,
tl;dr - just like Debian does, we do recommend using Raspian on rpi1
boards version 1 to take full advantage of their rather strange
architecture.
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > The only option I have: install from scratch wi
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
[cut]
>
> The only option I have: install from scratch with Devuans "armel" Image.
> But this is not really an option, I will loose hardfloat, making my PI
> even more slower than it already is. So I stay with Raspbian Jessie.
>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
> Am 06.02.2017 um 09:22 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > Like, for the same reason why you use packages compiled for amd64 with
> > your shiny Intel i5, despite you could have used packages compiled for
> > an i486 back in 1994? :)
> >
>
> That'
Am 06.02.2017 um 09:22 schrieb KatolaZ:
> Like, for the same reason why you use packages compiled for amd64 with
> your shiny Intel i5, despite you could have used packages compiled for
> an i486 back in 1994? :)
>
That's exactly the point. Nobody comes up with the idea to compile
packages for the
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:32:54AM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Am 05.02.2017 um 22:34 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > Because that image is an armv6 + hard float, so it works
> > everywhere.
> >
> >
>
> So why are the Devuan Images not compiled the same way?
>
Like, for the same reason why you use packages
Am 05.02.2017 um 22:34 schrieb KatolaZ:
> Because that image is an armv6 + hard float, so it works
> everywhere.
>
>
So why are the Devuan Images not compiled the same way?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/m
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:02:21PM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
[cut]
>
> But thats without hardfloat. What I need is ARMv6 with hardfloat. I'm
> wondering why Raspbian has only one Image that works with all. How do
> they do that?
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/
>
Because that image is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 22:02:21 +0100
"J. Fahrner" wrote:
> But thats without hardfloat. What I need is ARMv6 with hardfloat. I'm
> wondering why Raspbian has only one Image that works with all. How do
> they do that?
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/dow
Am 05.02.2017 um 18:58 schrieb Florian Zieboll:
>
> "Raspbian armhf" is a special build for rpi1: ARMv6 with hardfloat
> support. This is the actual reason for Raspian's existence, as the
> common "armhf" builds are compiled for ARMv7.
ok, that explains the segmentation faults on my PI1 model B.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:36:29 +0100
"J. Fahrner" wrote:
> Strange. Mine is a PI 1 Model B. (armhf architecture). Maybe the
> current packages are not compatible with that? But original Raspbian
> Jessie (armhf) works fine. Only Devuan has segmentatio
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:51:54PM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> has someone had success in installing Devuan on Raspberry Pi?
>
> My first attempt was to upgrade from Raspbian Wheezy following this guide:
>
> https://git.devuan.org/dev1fanboy/Upgrade-Install-Devuan/wikis/Upgrade-to-Devu
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 06:36:29PM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.02.2017 um 18:23 schrieb Florian Zieboll:
> >
> >
> > Both ways it worked like a charm.
> >
>
> Strange. Mine is a PI 1 Model B. (armhf architecture). Maybe the current
> packages are not compatible with that? But original R
Am 05.02.2017 um 18:23 schrieb Florian Zieboll:
>
>
> Both ways it worked like a charm.
>
Strange. Mine is a PI 1 Model B. (armhf architecture). Maybe the current
packages are not compatible with that? But original Raspbian Jessie
(armhf) works fine. Only Devuan has segmentation faults.
--
Mit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 17:51:54 +0100
"J. Fahrner" wrote:
> has someone had success in installing Devuan on Raspberry Pi?
I have Devuan armhf running on a rpi2, installed from the first Beta image -
here
the link to my li'l HOWTO [1].
Some time bef
On 02/05/2017 11:51 AM, J. Fahrner wrote:
[snip]
has someone had success in installing Devuan on Raspberry Pi?
Havn't gotten around to Pi yet, But did have a Acer laptop with no
cd/dvd. I installed from a external usb cd/dvd, and I copyies the beta2
iso to usb and installed that way.
justmy2c
Hello again,
just a hint for the resolute ones among us, as I think this hasn't been
mentioned on this list yet: Adding the following lines to e.g. the file
/etc/apt/preferences.d/avoid-systemd should make ultimately sure, that
libsystemd0 will not be accidentally pulled in by some felted packag
Florian Zieboll writes:
[...]
> check for systemd:
> # apt-get install aptitude
> # aptitude search '?installed' | grep systemd
> #
JFTR: dpkg -l will give you a list of installed packages and their
descriptions so
dpkg -l | grep systemd
or
dpkg -l | grep -i systemd
should work for th
21 matches
Mail list logo
