Rainer Weikusat wrote:
A more accurate summary would be "Fedora is not yet switching
to wayland as default for 24".
It is, but even though who knows. Ubuntu had been planning to
switch to the "bananager" since 2010 [1] till Mir appeared
in 2013.
[1]: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/5
2016-03-14 21:37 GMT+01:00, Rainer Weikusat :
> But GNOME developers presumably don't belong to a social class of people
> buying cheap stuff in brick & mortar high street shops ...
And that makes the issue quite strange: the evoluent vertical mouse
has four buttons
and a scrollwheel. All pro-gami
mitt_gr...@riseup.net writes:
> Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
> https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
A more accurate summary would be "Fedora is not yet switching to wayland
as default for 24".
Entertaining read:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/Prima
Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:06:18PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>>
>> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
>> transparently forwarded over the SSH connection and some convenience
>> features like "setting up a suitable DISPLAY" and
>> "handling MI
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:06:18PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
> transparently forwarded over the SSH connection and some convenience
> features like "setting up a suitable DISPLAY" and
> "handling MIT magic cookie authentication
2016-03-06 21:33 GMT+01:00, Rainer Weikusat :
> Not at all, actually. VNC based on keeping two bitmapped displays in
> sync by sending by sending 'bitmap updates' from the remote machine to
> 'the local display'. Even in a LAN environment (disclaimer: Haven't used
> it since 2004) this is a clunky
Simon Hobson writes:
[...]
> Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
>>> Is that what I get with ssh -X? I've noticed it's sometimes quite klunky.
>>
>> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
>> transparently forwarded over the SSH connection and some convenience
>> features like "se
Teodoro Santoni wrote:
>> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
>
> Nothing afaik.
That would be the "we don't use it, therefore we don't care if anyone else uses
it - we'll just declare it broken behaviour and drop it" approach to backwards
compatibility.
Rainer We
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:33:46PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> Teodoro Santoni writes:
>> > 2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
>> >> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
>> >
>> > Nothing afaik.
>> > Some people are enabling VNC for wayla
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:33:46PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Teodoro Santoni writes:
> > 2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
> >> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
> >
> > Nothing afaik.
> > Some people are enabling VNC for wayland compositors though.
> > The
Mitt Green writes:
> This question is long-standing, but I forget to
> ask it. What's wrong with Wayland?
For instance, it (reportedly) doesn't have any support for IPC. This
means it can't support "window manager/ desktop environment tranparent"
copy&paste anymore. That's instead supposed to be
Teodoro Santoni writes:
> 2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
>> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
>
> Nothing afaik.
> Some people are enabling VNC for wayland compositors though.
> They are very akin technologies.
Not at all, actually. VNC based on keeping two b
2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
Nothing afaik.
Some people are enabling VNC for wayland compositors though.
They are very akin technologies.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:13:36 +0100
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:57:16PM +0300, Mitt Green wrote:
> >ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
>
> As far as I know Wayland doesn’t support TCP connections anymore, so
> you don’t have X11 forwarding anymore.
If that's t
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 16:57:16 +0300
Mitt Green wrote:
> This question is long-standing, but I forget to
> ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
> it, except for a couple of broken Fedora Live
> sessions, when everything freezes.
>
> Mitt
From what I understand, Wayland is shot through
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:57:16PM +0300, Mitt Green wrote:
ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
As far as I know Wayland doesn’t support TCP connections anymore, so you
don’t have X11 forwarding anymore.
So for me Wayland is useless.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
|
17 matches
Mail list logo
