Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67

2020-01-12 Thread 'smee via Dng
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 21:51 -0500, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 1/12/20 9:19 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > > Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not > > installed. I > > guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since > > it's the latest) it would pickup the cor

Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67

2020-01-12 Thread fsmithred via Dng
On 1/12/20 9:19 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not installed. I > guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since > it's the latest) it would pickup the correct version...? > If you install i2pd 2.23.0-1 from beowulf, you will

Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67

2020-01-12 Thread 'smee via Dng
Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not installed. I guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since it's the latest) it would pickup the correct version...? On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 20:59 -0500, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 1/12/20 8:40 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote

Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67

2020-01-12 Thread fsmithred via Dng
On 1/12/20 8:40 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > I tried running i2pd on my recently upgraded Beowulf instance but found > it errors out looking for libboost 1.62.0 libraries, which > libboostx.xx-dev appears to be an automatic install. > > Should I expect any problems rolling libboost1.67.0 back to 1.