>This is the exact situation in which I'm glad for containers and VMs.
>Use all the systemd you want, but keep it in a Biosafety level 4
>containment facility.
I'd use a VM. I suspect a container or chroot would not be sufficient. =)
All jokes aside, this would be why I am watching the systembs
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:28PM +0100, David Harrison wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 20:43, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
> >Well, the problem here is that systemd is*not* hot-pluggable, at all,
> >as we have recently learned the hard way.
>
> Here's a thought. Thrown to the list with no requisite
David Harrison wrote:
On 05/05/2015 20:43, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
Well, the problem here is that systemd is*not* hot-pluggable, at all,
as we have recently learned the hard way.
Here's a thought. Thrown to the list with no requisite knowledge to
back it up, so please don't bite!
On 05/05/2015 20:43, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
Well, the problem here is that systemd is*not* hot-pluggable, at all,
as we have recently learned the hard way.
Here's a thought. Thrown to the list with no requisite knowledge to back
it up, so please don't bite!
Is there any way of bu
rtolo<mailto:edb...@gmail.com>
Sent: 5/5/2015 12:52 PM
To: Hendrik Boom<mailto:hend...@topoi.pooq.com>
Cc: dng@lists.dyne.org<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [Dng] why someone might want systemd on devuan
I will only say a few words.
The purpose of Devuan was to promote so
I will only say a few words.
The purpose of Devuan was to promote software freedom and more
specifically software choice. If systemd & Co. change drastically,
which is clearly very unlikely to happen, it will be a completely
another situation, and systemd & Co. may start forming part of a
project
On Tue, 5 May 2015 14:43:09 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Well, yes. I can imagine a systemd hater who discovers down the road
> that he needs a package that's been comtaminated with systemd. Maybe
> instead of going whole-hog systemd, which is that the other distros
> force him to do, he can
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:43:09PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
>
> Well, yes. I can imagine a systemd hater who discovers down the road
> that he needs a package that's been comtaminated with systemd. Maybe
> instead of going whole-hog systemd, which is that the other distros
> force h
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:53:28PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:35:57PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:49:34AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Noel,
> > >
> > > Having any systemd-equipped Devuan packages means that I need to always
> > > b
