On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:55:01PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:09:50PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> >
> > Aren't there wallpapers provided by the DE's, eg. xfce4? In this
> > case, it isn't usefull to provide anything else.
> > Didier
>
> And in fact, it wo
Le 28/02/2015 05:17, Isaac Dunham a écrit :
What baffles me is that Lennart *has* written a daemon specifically to
*avoid* hung boots due to networks being down. It's called ifplugd.
(And yes, if I used my ethernet port more often than the twice a year
I now use it, I might want to use ifplugd
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:13:24PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:56:56PM +, Matthew Melton wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >
> > > Just to support my point, Debian has a great logo, but this is what is
> > > currently happening to the users of Jessie, thanks to the
> > > systemd-
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Gravis wrote:
> - people will switch when the annoyance of unexpected systemd behavior
> outweighs the annoyance of getting rid of systemd
> - developers will stop using it when something nicer with wider support
> comes along or they personally are fed up with sys
> How much should systemd damage the image of GNU/Linux before everybody
realise how much of a nonsense it is?
the image of linux is /not/ what will cause change.
- people will switch when the annoyance of unexpected systemd behavior
outweighs the annoyance of getting rid of systemd
- developers
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:56:56PM +, Matthew Melton wrote:
[cut]
> >
> > Just to support my point, Debian has a great logo, but this is what is
> > currently happening to the users of Jessie, thanks to the
> > systemd-nonsense:
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/02/msg00013.
Matthew Melton
m...@mjmworks.co.uk
KatolaZ wrote
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:13:38PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> >
> > Well, I agree about the necessity of having a logo, but there is no
> > point into having a great brand without anything concrete behind it,
> > IMHO
Le 27/02/2015 00:07, Joel Roth a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:02:16PM -0500, Gravis wrote:
> >http://www.saynotogmos.org/ss/penguins/trio.png
>
>ha! it just needs words like "Linux: Strut your stuff" [?]
I thought of photoshopping in a jail out of which they are
walking.
Both
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:09:50PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> Le 26/02/2015 18:04, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
> >On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Anto wrote:
> >>On 26/02/15 15:50, hellekin wrote:
> >>>The logo threads are multiplying: it shows the impatience is growing.
> >>>What I'd like
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:02:16PM -0500, Gravis wrote:
> > http://www.saynotogmos.org/ss/penguins/trio.png
>
> ha! it just needs words like "Linux: Strut your stuff" [?]
I thought of photoshopping in a jail out of which they are
walking.
> --Gravis
--
Joel Roth
> http://www.saynotogmos.org/ss/penguins/trio.png
ha! it just needs words like "Linux: Strut your stuff" [?]
--Gravis
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> On Thu, 2/26/15, Linuxito wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [Dng] simple backgrounds
> To: "Anto&quo
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> The best solution would probably be to use a text identity until the graphics
> get sorted after the alpha is released.
There's a certain project called hasciicam which can be used to create
very nifty text logos...
> For the record . . . I sub
Le 26/02/2015 18:04, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Anto wrote:
On 26/02/15 15:50, hellekin wrote:
The logo threads are multiplying: it shows the impatience is growing.
What I'd like to see instead is a focus on a real issue we have, which
is shipping desktop
On Thursday, 26 de February de 2015 17:54:01 Jaromil escribió:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, etech3 wrote:
> > +1 hendrik
>
> yes, we will not cover up boot with framebuffer stuff for sure.
>
> so to say
>
> Devuan is sugar-free and doesn't makes your computer fat :^)
I want the freedom to take my Dev
On Thu, 2/26/15, Linuxito wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] simple backgrounds
To: "Anto"
Cc: "dng"
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2015, 1:03 PM
> I agree with you. We need identity, and more important, we need a brand.
>
> Although I know nothing about marketing,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:13:38PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
[cut]
>
>
> Well, I agree about the necessity of having a logo, but there is no
> point into having a great brand without anything concrete behind it,
> IMHO. I believe that the most important thing at the moment is to have
> a working De
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:03:42PM -0300, Linuxito wrote:
> I agree with you. We need identity, and more important, we need a brand.
>
> Although I know nothing about marketing, I think a logo it's the most
> important component of a brand. It will help us make our distribution known
> by others,
I agree with you. We need identity, and more important, we need a brand.
Although I know nothing about marketing, I think a logo it's the most
important component of a brand. It will help us make our distribution known
by others, it will bring contributions, donations, etc.
So I believe choosing
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:22:15PM +0100, Anto wrote:
> On 26/02/15 18:04, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >And don't want Devuan deelopers to waste time on them if it means
> >delaying our release. After a usable release, we'll have time for
> >such matters.
> >
> >-- hendrik
>
> Hello Hendrik,
>
> I agr
On 26/02/15 18:04, Hendrik Boom wrote:
And don't want Devuan deelopers to waste time on them if it means
delaying our release. After a usable release, we'll have time for
such matters.
-- hendrik
Hello Hendrik,
I agree with what you mentioned as the highest priority is to get the
first vers
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, etech3 wrote:
> +1 hendrik
yes, we will not cover up boot with framebuffer stuff for sure.
so to say
Devuan is sugar-free and doesn't makes your computer fat :^)
> May I suggest some timeline milestones here (which I know is around
> to the Devs). I for one would look forw
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:43:50PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:19:05PM -0500, etech3 wrote:
> > +1 hendrik
> >
> > May I suggest some timeline milestones here (which I know is around
> > to the Devs). I for one would look forword to a working base install
> > with no DE
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:19:05PM -0500, etech3 wrote:
> +1 hendrik
>
> May I suggest some timeline milestones here (which I know is around
> to the Devs). I for one would look forword to a working base install
> with no DE. That could be a alpha 0.XX milestone.
Do you meen no X? no window mana
+1 hendrik
May I suggest some timeline milestones here (which I know is around to
the Devs). I for one would look forword to a working base install with
no DE. That could be a alpha 0.XX milestone.
Just saying ...
As golinux says, may the fork be with you
On 02/26/2015 12:04 PM, Hendrik Boo
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Anto wrote:
> On 26/02/15 15:50, hellekin wrote:
> >The logo threads are multiplying: it shows the impatience is growing.
> >What I'd like to see instead is a focus on a real issue we have, which
> >is shipping desktop background designs. This is not a uni
25 matches
Mail list logo
