Hi,
> Did you have any luck with the packaging scripts under tools/? If you
> have fpm [1] installed, just running 'make' in the tools/ directory
> should generate some .debs.
No. And I strongly disagree with individual source packages carrying
their own dist-packaging stuff. Instead the distro'
Hey Enrico,
Did you have any luck with the packaging scripts under tools/? If you have
fpm [1] installed, just running 'make' in the tools/ directory should
generate some .debs.
-Jude
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <
enrico.weig...@gr13.net> wrote:
> On 02.01
On 02.01.2015 18:12, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> ls -l /lib/i386-linux-gnu/
> in my Debian partition shows all .so's except ld-2.19.so being chmod a-x.
Already got an answer on debian-devel: +x is not required and
should not be set (except some rare cases).
The interesting question here is: why does g
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 04:52:11PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm just packaging Jude's fskit to various deb distros using
> pbuilder + git-buildpackage.
>
> Unfortunately, the .so's loose the +x flag in the package
> (while usual 'make install' is okay) -
Hi folks,
I'm just packaging Jude's fskit to various deb distros using
pbuilder + git-buildpackage.
Unfortunately, the .so's loose the +x flag in the package
(while usual 'make install' is okay) - it seems that some of the
dh stuff drops that flag :(
maybe some of you guys might have an idea ?
