On 04.01.2015 20:52, Dima Krasner wrote:
> Yes, when built against systemd, both GDM and LightDM depend on it
> quite heavily, both directly and via stuff like AccountsService,
> D-Bus, gnome-session, gnome-shell and whatever. Just take a look at
> the code - lots of LOGIND_RUNNING() all over. It'
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:52:18PM +0200, Dima Krasner wrote:
> Yes, when built against systemd, both GDM and LightDM depend on it quite
> heavily, both directly and via stuff like AccountsService, D-Bus,
> gnome-session, gnome-shell and whatever. Just take a look at the code -
> lots of LOGIND_RU
Don't get me started ;)
Yes, when built against systemd, both GDM and LightDM depend on it quite
heavily, both directly and via stuff like AccountsService, D-Bus,
gnome-session, gnome-shell and whatever. Just take a look at the code - lots of
LOGIND_RUNNING() all over. It's extremely hard to is
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:22:52PM +0200, Dima Krasner wrote:
> Indeed, it's a good way forward for now.
>
> Once everything is in place, I'll start playing with rebuilding GDM
> without tons of dependencies, to ease the debugging of LoginKit. Once
> I can debug GDM on a Devuan system with sysvi
hings will be a lot easier.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:08:34 -0800
Go Linux wrote:
> On Sun, 1/4/15, Franco Lanza wrote:
>
> Subject: [Dng] Release roadmap
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Date: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:03 AM
>
> As many already known,
> i will be unreliabl
On Sun, 1/4/15, Franco Lanza wrote:
Subject: [Dng] Release roadmap
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:03 AM
As many already known,
i will be unreliable next week, and this will cause a little bit
of slow down in the package repository population.
Sorry for that, but
As many already known,
i will be unreliable next week, and this will cause a little bit
of slow down in the package repository population.
Sorry for that, but my primary job is calling me for a week long trip
i cannot postpone.
Anyway, i want to let you know the roadmap i have for the release of
