Constitutional Amendments, but let's discuss that elsewhere if needed.
-Jim
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 21:45:59 +0200
> From: k...@in2p3.fr
> To: arya...@chello.at; dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] Please stop vain discussion
>
>
> Le 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto a écrit
Le 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto a écrit :
On 06/05/15 10:23, Didier Kryn wrote:
Dear devuaners,
Debatting wether Devuan should allow systemd usage or forbid it
completely, or wether it should eradicate systemd service files from
all packages is interesting, but for sure prematurate. Let's di
Am 06.05.2015 20:47 schrieb Nextime:
The official position is: we will support anything that can be
packaged without hijacking the whole system to be installed. Actually
systemd doesn't match this requirement, so, devuan will not support it
as long it doesn't radically change. Anyway we will not
On May 6, 2015 8:33:31 PM CEST, Laurent Bercot wrote:
>On 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto wrote:
>> When I started this thread, I genuinely asked technical question
>> related to what I am doing in removing systemd's files from Debian
>> sources of some packages. I am quite sure that I didn't propose or
>>
On 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto wrote:
When I started this thread, I genuinely asked technical question
related to what I am doing in removing systemd's files from Debian
sources of some packages. I am quite sure that I didn't propose or
demand that to be implemented in Devuan. I am doing that all sole
On 06/05/15 10:23, Didier Kryn wrote:
Dear devuaners,
Debatting wether Devuan should allow systemd usage or forbid it
completely, or wether it should eradicate systemd service files from
all packages is interesting, but for sure prematurate. Let's discuss
that when someone proposes to d
Dear devuaners,
Debatting wether Devuan should allow systemd usage or forbid it
completely, or wether it should eradicate systemd service files from all
packages is interesting, but for sure prematurate. Let's discuss that
when someone proposes to do the job.
Up to now nobody has
