On Thursday, 12 de February de 2015 18:28:15 Usspookes Lovesystemd escribió:
> Why? Bastille is/was great.
>
> It didn't change, the rug was pulled out from underneath it.
> Who would have thought routines in TK and ncurses would be
> Dpreeeciattteedd!!! (gay voice of the SJWers)
I'll put it
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:16:42PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Isn't Bastille a set of scripts to harden Debian security?
> Well, IMMHO, Devuan shouldn't need such a collection if said security
> was default (which should be).
I don't know what Bastille is supposed to do. But its security
pro
Isn't Bastille a set of scripts to harden Debian security?
Well, IMMHO, Devuan shouldn't need such a collection if said security
was default (which should be).
Cheers,
Nuno
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mai
[Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan -
Conflict of Interest
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:34:30 +0100
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:24:37AM +0200, Martijn Dekkers wrote:
> Can we make some option with a "ban this user" link at the bottom of
> emails, and when enough listus
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:24:37AM +0200, Martijn Dekkers wrote:
> Can we make some option with a "ban this user" link at the bottom of
> emails, and when enough listusers click the link, a message is flagged for
> review?
Or at least a manual swing of the banhammer.
--
// If you believe in so-
evuan. It
> shows EXACTLY
> what you people are: rentseekers. You want your cut for each install (as
> security expert) FUCK YOU.
>
> --- f...@fleshless.org wrote:
>
> From: "Jack L. Frost"
> To: Roy Nielsen
> Cc: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
If find conversations like this annoying and inappropriate for a BLOG
that portends to be for building a new distribution of Linux.
When working (I'm retired) I dealt with such intransigent attitudes
across the spectrum. From my first work with comp
This one's a troll. I've added his new address to my killfile already.
-Jude
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:07 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:41:48AM -0800, Usspookes Lovesystemd wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > You are shitsucking scum in that you won't have Bastille for Devuan. It
> sh
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:41:48AM -0800, Usspookes Lovesystemd wrote:
[cut]
>
> You are shitsucking scum in that you won't have Bastille for Devuan. It shows
> EXACTLY
> what you people are: rentseekers. You want your cut for each install (as
> security expert) FUCK YOU.
>
Have you ever tho
useful things it did.
--- amr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Roy Nielsen
To: usspookslovesyste...@muchomail.com
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
- Frauds and liars
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:51:13 -0700
I actually am not making a joke of it. If you look around har
Why the hell do you laugh and make a joke of this. You people really are scum.The goal wasn't to dot every I and cross every T. The goal was to dot as many i's and as many T's one could think of in a normal Linux (UNIX LIKE LINUX) install.And that goal WAS achieved. Bastille is a great post-install
: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:13:42 +0300
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:10:27AM -0700, Roy Nielsen wrote:
> I don't believe the task is impossible, I'm sure there are people
> working on such a tool
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:10:27AM -0700, Roy Nielsen wrote:
> I don't believe the task is impossible, I'm sure there are people
> working on such a tool and perhaps they will even open source it!
>
> Regards,
> -Roy
As an industry specialist dealing with security even as a non-infosec guy, I'm
c
I don't believe the task is impossible, I'm sure there are people
working on such a tool and perhaps they will even open source it!
Regards,
-Roy
On 2/11/2015 11:01 AM, Jack L. Frost wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0500, Gravis wrote:
wow. congrats on being highly offensive on you
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0500, Gravis wrote:
> wow. congrats on being highly offensive on your very first post.
>
> anyway, i looked at Bastille and it's a highly tweaked script and
> headed toward being a decade out of date. frankly i'm not surprised
> it was dropped. Linux security
usfar (sadly NOTHING).
--- rin...@adaptivetime.com wrote:
From: Gravis
To: "dng@lists.dyne.org"
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:55:07 -0500
wow. congrats on being highly offensive on your very first post.
anyway, i looked
Decade out of date?
SysV is 3 decades "out of date"
Unix is 4 decades "out of date"
Please explain to me how the bastille script is "out of date", and why that is
bad.
Slackware, a great distribution, is similarly out of date.
Anything not using systemd (that trash) is out of date.
Why don't yo
From: Go Linux
To: "dng@lists.dyne.org" , Gravis
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:38:59 -0800
On Wed, 2/11/15, Gravis wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
To: "dng@lists.dyne.org"
On Wed, 2/11/15, Gravis wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan
To: "dng@lists.dyne.org"
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 7:55 AM
> wow. congrats on being highly offensive on your very first post.
>
> anyway, i looked at Bas
wow. congrats on being highly offensive on your very first post.
anyway, i looked at Bastille and it's a highly tweaked script and
headed toward being a decade out of date. frankly i'm not surprised
it was dropped. Linux security needs an overhaul but your bastille
script is off mark.
--Gravis
Could you please revive bastille linux for devuan. It's an essential hardining
script and it is unlikely anyone will have a secure system without it.
For some reason on the newer debian 7s it does not run (is this by design?)
On the older debian 7s it runs fine.
Debian removed it around the time t
21 matches
Mail list logo
