Thanks for the news and your efforts.
We are waiting as patiently as possible. :)
Probably many Debian derivatives are anxiously awaiting, as well.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2015, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=3
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=38916
>
> While I knew of its existence, I never tried Crunchbag, so I cannot
> comment on its features or user experience.
It is a big shame. Crunchbang is a gread distro, I've used it and know
many people
Am Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:00:02 +
schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org:
> I am a crunchbanger, and my sense is that the community was fine with
> systemd, that it intended to roll right on in to Jesse without asking
> any questions. The thinking was "Crunchbang is based on Debian, and
> so it will
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:53:27 -0600
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=38916
>
> While I knew of its existence, I never tried Crunchbag, so I cannot
> comment on its features or user experience. Seems a shame that for
> whatever reason this Debian derivative is c
I am a crunchbanger, and my sense is that the community was fine with systemd, that it
intended to roll right on in to Jesse without asking any questions. The thinking was
"Crunchbang is based on Debian, and so it will follow Debian's lead."
(It was a really great distro while it lasted)
On
http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=38916
While I knew of its existence, I never tried Crunchbag, so I cannot
comment on its features or user experience. Seems a shame that for
whatever reason this Debian derivative is ceasing development. The
article doesn't really cite specifics othe
