Le 02/05/2015 10:52, marc...@welz.org.za a écrit :
> >Now as for other assertions in this thread that the FHS itself is
> >obsolete and violations of it should not be considered a bad thing, just
> >no.
>
> I don't think anyone said that.
I did. Shame on me.
Didier
On 02/05/2015 10:52, marc...@welz.org.za wrote:
... confusing - it is unclear if he is arguing that departures from the
standard should be entertained or not.
I am arguing that FHS includes good things and bad things, and that
good things should be followed and bad things should not. In other
Me again
So I am going to quote Laurent a bit out of order, sorry about
that, but it seems the best way to explain things:
> >Now as for other assertions in this thread that the FHS itself is
> >obsolete and violations of it should not be considered a bad thing, just
> >no.
>
> I don't think an
