Simon Hobson writes:
> Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> That's a long rant about 'systemd architecture' with an inflammatory
>> subject someone posted to the systemd devel list. It didn't receive any
>> replies more noteworthy than the original text which is 'hardly
>> surprising'.
[...]
> But one thi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:14:39PM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
[...]
> But one thing I did pick up on, one of the reasons given
> for not having any subdivision was a desire to not have to
> have documented and stable APIs. I find that "a tad
> off-putting" because in the projects I used to work in
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> That's a long rant about 'systemd architecture' with an inflammatory
> subject someone posted to the systemd devel list. It didn't receive any
> replies more noteworthy than the original text which is 'hardly
> surprising'.
Ah, I'm not alone in thinking that then - shoul
Andrea writes:
> I was reading the systemd dev list to keep current and found
> this thread gem:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-September/034264.html
That's a long rant about 'systemd architecture' with an inflammatory
subject someone posted to the systemd devel lis
