On 07/01/17 21:21, Simon Hobson wrote:
In general - none !
So, why not just patching the crap out and filing an upstream bug
(incl. notifying the folks here, so we can keep an eye on it) ?
--mtx
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://maili
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 18:36:40 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > > fate accompli
> > "Fate"
> > is very apposite in the circumstance
> One misspell and a person's reputation is shot forever!
> :-)
And me thinking it was purposefully done ;-3)
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Have
* On 2017 01 Jul 11:47 -0500, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > fate accompli
>
> "Fate"
> is very apposite in the circumstance
One misspell and a person's reputation is shot forever!
:-)
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live i
Le 01/07/2017 à 18:46, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
fate accompli
"Fate"
is very apposite in the circumstance
Cheers,
Ron.
"Fait accompli" means "accomplished fact", something it's a
nonsense to oppose to, because it's do
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" wrote:
> At that point I'm curious which fancy features of systemd are needed
> by applications at all ?
In general - none !
But, it seems that the technique being used by it's proponents is to substitute
their stuff and "force" new APIs on developers. Ie, pic
On 07/01/17 15:25, Nate Bargmann wrote:
Certainly, that trend has been well established. What is troubling are
all of the other distributions who treat it as fate accompli. My hope
is that Devuan, Slackware, and other distributions that have staked out
a position that seeks to maintain the tra
Quoting Nate Bargmann (n...@n0nb.us):
> I'll admit, there was one trick that SD did that I liked, and that was
> starting CUPS only when there was a call to print. I don't print often
> so bringing up CUPS on demand and then shutting it down later was nice.
> But then, SD was running all the time
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> fate accompli
"Fate"
is very apposite in the circumstance
Cheers,
Ron.
--
It is a typically Hohenzollern idea to believe that it is a crime
for a country to defend itself after its army has been destroyed.
* On 2017 01 Jul 08:49 -0500, vmlinux wrote:
> It makes more sense when you consider that systemd is a thinly veiled
> excuse for an init daemon which really wants to replace every distro
> out there with something red hat has more control over.
Certainly, that trend has been well established. W
It makes more sense when you consider that systemd is a thinly veiled excuse
for an init daemon which really wants to replace every distro out there with
something red hat has more control over.
On July 1, 2017 8:25:56 AM CDT, vmlinux wrote:
::
::
::On June 30, 2017 1:14:24 AM CDT, Nate Bargma
On June 30, 2017 1:14:24 AM CDT, Nate Bargmann wrote:
::* On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
::
::> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an
::init
::> system?
::
::The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
::
::- Nate
::
::--
On 30/06/17 08:56, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> It's driven by Red Hat to make money out of supporting their
> development.
>
Hammer -> Nail
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:07:46 +0200
Jaromil wrote:
> If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float
> by.
> - Sun Tzu
I'm afraid he never wrote that: See for instance
https://shibumimanagementcanada.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/invented-sun-tzu-art-of-war-quotes/
Che
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
> On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> >> system?
> >
> > The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daem
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2017 schrieb Aldemir Akpinar:
> On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> >> system?
> >
> > The same thing that a time sync (NTP
Am 2017-06-30 07:53, schrieb Alessandro Selli:
Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an
init
system?
systemd is _NOT_ an init system. That's a mythos. Systemd started as an
init system, but evolved step-by-step to a monolithic low level Linux
userland. It's drive
On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
>> system?
>
> The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
>
> - Nate
>
And these lads still
* On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> system?
The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The
Issues just keep piling up:
https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3341-1/
Summary
systemd-resolved could be made to crash or run programs if it received a
specially crafted DNS response.
Details
An out-of-bounds write was discovered in systemd-resolved when handling
specially crafted DNS responses.
19 matches
Mail list logo
