Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Bob Proulx via Dng
ael via Dng wrote: > Isn't conv=sync needed to make sure that you are not just seeing buffer > effects? Better oflags=sync,direct rather than conv=sync though both are similar in result. Bob signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dng mailing lis

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Bruce Perens via Dng
Speed tests on cached filesystems don't do what is expected. The kernel will write into RAM as much as it can, and leave the actual I/O for later. On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:39 PM Jakub Juszczakiewicz via Dng < dng@lists.dyne.org> wrote: > Hi list, > > What is time between call dd? On ext fi

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Jakub Juszczakiewicz via Dng
Hi list, What is time between call dd? On ext filesystems is implemented delay before physically write date on disk. It's for e.g. minimally files fragmentation. Second question is that, did you try call "sync" command after each of writes? --- Best regards, Jakub Juszczakiewicz Krypto-I

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 23 June 2022 at 15:41:21, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng wrote: > This does not make sense to me: > > >> dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 > > >> > > >> reports 2.6 GB (expected) > > IMO ~ 1GB is expected, not 2.6: > > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 > 1+0 Datensätze ein > 1+0 D

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread ael via Dng
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 03:41:21PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng wrote: > > >> > > >> when i write to a disk: > > >> dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 > > >> > > >> reports 2.6 GB (expected) > > >> doing again speed drops to 200MB. Isn't conv=sync needed to make sure that you are not just se

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng
This does not make sense to me: > >> dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 > >> > >> reports 2.6 GB (expected) IMO ~ 1GB is expected, not 2.6: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 1+0 Datensätze ein 1+0 Datensätze aus 1073741824 Bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) kopiert, 0,617959 s, 1,7 GB/s Nik Anno domin

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Radisson via Dng
Its a normal HD i guess 4096 is ok, but i do not think that this matters. Am 23.06.22 um 13:11 schrieb Rich W: Hi, A blocksize of 1G seems extreme. What is the optimal blocksize of the output device? Cheers, -Rich On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 4:52 AM Radisson via Dng wrote: Hi list, i found a s

Re: [DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Rich W via Dng
Hi, A blocksize of 1G seems extreme. What is the optimal blocksize of the output device? Cheers, -Rich On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 4:52 AM Radisson via Dng wrote: > Hi list, > i found a strange ext4 (?) effect. > > when i write to a disk: > dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 > > reports 2.6 GB (ex

[DNG] strange effect on overwrite

2022-06-23 Thread Radisson via Dng
Hi list, i found a strange ext4 (?) effect. when i write to a disk: dd if=/dev/zero of=xx bs=1G count=1 reports 2.6 GB (expected) doing again speed drops to 200MB. removing xx restores old speed. I ask the net and it seems that the effect is there since kernel 2.6. I found the explainations a