On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:10:40AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> for version 2:3.3.12-3 of procps, Ivan J. did a fix in devuan to not
> depend to libsystemd. Now, we got the updated version 2:3.3.12-4 from
> debian and there is a new ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
for version 2:3.3.12-3 of procps, Ivan J. did a fix in devuan to not
depend to libsystemd. Now, we got the updated version 2:3.3.12-4 from
debian and there is a new version 2:3.3.13-1 in queue. When updating the
system with 2:3.3.12-4 coming fro
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:59:32PM +0300, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
> On 4 Jul 2015 13:15, "Didier Kryn" wrote:
> Yes indeed. Soon it is going to be systemd/linux not gnu/linux
LOL! Actually, I'm reading this thread, and wondering whether I should
snort with laughter, or cry. I want to do a bit of b
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 10:40:42AM +0200, Fred DC wrote:
> So it is: libprocps4 depends on libsystemd0
To clarify:
That's a package dependency. That's procps being built with systemd support.
It's not procps hard-depending on systemd.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 04/07/2015 11:10, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> >To me it seems that libsystemd0 for some developers is similar to libc
>
> That's how Systemd is going pretty fast to become SystemdOS.
> Next step is to merge libc into libsyste
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 13:59:32 +0300
Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
> Soon it is going to be systemd/linux not gnu/linux
Or it is going to be systemd/linux AND gnu/linux, going their separate ways.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Only after the last river has been poisoned,
Only afte
On 4 Jul 2015 13:15, "Didier Kryn" wrote:
>
> Le 04/07/2015 11:10, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
>>
>> To me it seems that libsystemd0 for some developers is similar to libc
>
>
> That's how Systemd is going pretty fast to become SystemdOS. Next
step is to merge libc into libsystemd0. I think d
Le 04/07/2015 11:10, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
To me it seems that libsystemd0 for some developers is similar to libc
That's how Systemd is going pretty fast to become SystemdOS. Next
step is to merge libc into libsystemd0. I think distros enforcing it
should assume this fact by puttin
Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 10:40:42 schrieb Fred DC:
> On 04/07/2015 10:26, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > So it seems this is not a *direct* dependency. It may be that some of
> > the
> > dependencies depend on libsystemd0.
>
> So it is: libprocps4 depends on libsystemd0
*yikes*, I missed this one
On 04/07/2015 10:26, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> So it seems this is not a *direct* dependency. It may be that some of the
> dependencies depend on libsystemd0.
>
So it is: libprocps4 depends on libsystemd0
Fred
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.
On Friday 03 July 2015 20:40:13 Mitt wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using unstable (Ceres), for quite some time now libprocps4 and thus
> procps depend on libsystemd0. On stable (Jessie) there is libprocps3
> which does not depend on it.
I cannot confirm this:
merkaba:~> apt-cache show procps
Pac
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:40:13PM +0300, Mitt wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using unstable (Ceres), for quite some time now libprocps4 and thus
> procps depend on libsystemd0. On stable (Jessie) there is libprocps3 which
> does not depend on it.
>
> Mitt
> ___
Hi everyone,
I'm using unstable (Ceres), for quite some time now libprocps4 and thus
procps depend on libsystemd0. On stable (Jessie) there is libprocps3
which does not depend on it.
Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.
13 matches
Mail list logo
