On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jim Jackson (j...@franjam.org.uk):
>
> > Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> > so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.
>
> Most-often mentioned alternative LDAs (local delivery agents) are
> Maildro
There's also Sieve. Not a drop-in replacement to procmail, but pretty
powerful.
On 12/12/18 5:08 PM, Joel Roth via Dng wrote:
Jim Jackson wrote:
Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.
I filter my incoming mail
Jim Jackson - 12.12.18, 15:33:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:
> > Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> > > It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything
> > > based on it. There have been a lot of reports in recent years of
> > > serious, unsafe bugs in
Jim Jackson wrote:
>
> Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.
I filter my incoming mail using perl script based on
https://metacpan.org/pod/Email::Filter. It is designed to
be a drop-in replacement for procmail, wi
Quoting Jim Jackson (j...@franjam.org.uk):
> Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.
Most-often mentioned alternative LDAs (local delivery agents) are
Maildrop, sieve[1], sortmail, and Dovecot LDA. (Me, I just per
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
> > on it. There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
> > unsafe bugs in its processing. However, there is
On 12/12/18 1:25 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
>> credible exploitation scenario. The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
>> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
>>
>> (I've gone through t
I wrote:
> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
> credible exploitation scenario. The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
>
> (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mai
On 12/12/18 1:13 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
>> It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
>> on it. There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
>> unsafe bugs in its processing. However, there is this c
Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
> on it. There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
> unsafe bugs in its processing. However, there is this comment about it
> from a former Procmail main
On 12/12/18 1:14 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Martin Steigerwald (mar...@lichtvoll.de):
[...]
>> Ah, I found it: smartlist. It appears to be a small, lightweight C
>> application. Debian is using this.
>
> Nicely summarised. Yes, SmartList seems to have carved out a neat
> little niche of mode
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 07:26:52PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:17:52PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small mailing
> > lists.
> >
> > Typically these will be for small groups of about five to twenty
> > subscribers
Quoting k...@aspodata.se (k...@aspodata.se):
> I'm using minimalist for a few local choirs.
> (git clone https://github.com/madroach/minimalist.git)
Nice! As a former Majordomo admin, I approve. (Minimalist looks to be
thoroughly modern. I merely mean it's a Perl-based mailing list manager
in
Quoting Martin Steigerwald (mar...@lichtvoll.de):
> AFAIK there are some smaller alternatives available, especially in case
> no web interface is needed. I do not recall the actual names. I do not
> recall the names currently. Sympa could be somewhat heavyweight as well.
>
> Ah, I found it: sma
Handrik:
> Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small mailing
> lists.
...
I'm using minimalist for a few local choirs.
(git clone https://github.com/madroach/minimalist.git)
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
---
Aspö
Hi.
KatolaZ - 11.12.18, 19:26:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:17:52PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small
> > mailing lists.
> >
> > Typically these will be for small groups of about five to twenty
> > subscribers, averaging one to five mes
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 07:26:52PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:17:52PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small mailing
> > lists.
> >
> > Typically these will be for small groups of about five to twenty
> > subscribers
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:17:52PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small mailing
> lists.
>
> Typically these will be for small groups of about five to twenty
> subscribers, averaging one to five messages a day.
>
> Especially desired: simp
Looking for free software recommendats for managing a few small mailing
lists.
Typically these will be for small groups of about five to twenty
subscribers, averaging one to five messages a day.
Especially desired: simplicity and small footprint software.
I'm currently using entries in /etc/al
Message: 3
>> > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:37:39 -0400
>> > From: Miles Fidelman > > <mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>>
>> > To: dng@lists.dyne.org <mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [DNG] mailing list software
only have to change the subject.
Just my 0.02
On 03-10-15 03:48, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:37:39 -0400
>From: Miles Fidelman
>To:dng@lists.dyne.org
>Subject: Re: [DNG] mailing list software
>Message-ID:<560eb2d3.4060...@meetingho
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:30:30PM -0400, JeremyBekka C wrote:
> I have been using my gmail account to read this mailing list but I would
> like to move over to a program specifically designed for mailing lists. I
> found mailman and it looks like it would work well. Just wondering if I
> could get
2015-10-02 18:30 GMT+02:00, JeremyBekka C :
> I have been using my gmail account to read this mailing list but I would
> like to move over to a program specifically designed for mailing lists. I
> found mailman and it looks like it would work well. Just wondering if I
> could get some suggestions a
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:37:39 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> JeremyBekka C wrote:
> > I have been using my gmail account to read this mailing list but I
> > would like to move over to a program specifically designed for
> > mailing lists. I found mailman and it looks like it would work
> > well. Ju
JeremyBekka C wrote:
I have been using my gmail account to read this mailing list but I
would like to move over to a program specifically designed for mailing
lists. I found mailman and it looks like it would work well. Just
wondering if I could get some suggestions about would program would be
I have been using my gmail account to read this mailing list but I would
like to move over to a program specifically designed for mailing lists. I
found mailman and it looks like it would work well. Just wondering if I
could get some suggestions about would program would be best to use with
this an
26 matches
Mail list logo
