Le 04/01/2022 à 03:08, Steve Litt a écrit :
k...@aspodata.se said on Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
Would there be any interests having a busybox_init package which
I could possible maintain (with a little help) ?
My opinion is that the more init systems the merrier, except for
system
Steve Litt:
...
> If busybox init does not require daemons to self-background, I'd be
> even more enthusiastic.
...
Busybox init has its inittab, mostly for gettys, and a boot script,
that is your options.
Having daemons not-backgrounded in the rcS script isn't practical
and I don't think that is
Karl:
> I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit
> by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off.
...
> One could possible (not tested) mimic sysvinit bootup by having
> for i in /etc/rc2.d/S*; do $i start; done
> in the rcS file or if you prefer you can have your own h
Curtis Maurand:
...
> I was reading the âcomment on systemdâ article. the last two sview
> and svcpage could be aliases to those shell scripts rewritten to
> take cli arguments in your .bashrc.
Whats wrong with
grep named /var/log/messages | less
and similar ?
///
Don't cc me, I'm on the l
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 6:08 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
>
> Didier Kryn:
>>> Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
>>> k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> ...
The sysinit thing is a how you start the system, it's just
one script /etc/init.d/r
k...@aspodata.se said on Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
>Would there be any interests having a busybox_init package which
>I could possible maintain (with a little help) ?
My opinion is that the more init systems the merrier, except for
systemd.
If busybox init does not require daemons t
Didier Kryn:
> Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit :
> > On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
> > k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
> >> The sysinit thing is a how you start the system, it's just
> >> one script /etc/init.d/rcS (or where you prefer to place it).
> >>
> >> One could possibl
Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit :
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
k...@aspodata.se wrote:
I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit
by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off.
Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git
Website at: http
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET)
k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit
> by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off.
>
> Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git
> Website at: https://busybox.net/
> Comment re. systemd:
I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit
by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off.
Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git
Website at: https://busybox.net/
Comment re. systemd: https://busybox.net/kill_it_with_fire.txt
Example inittab at:
https://git.bu
Steve Litt:
...
> This is the perfect opportunity to explore this more. Karl is one of
> the tiny minority of people to have successfully booted using the
> Busybox Init.
Why do you make it sound like it is difficult, it isn't something that
you need any advanced skill to solve. It's just that you
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:29:12 +0100
Simon Hobson wrote:
> k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> But then I'm one of those generally happy with SysVInit style
> booting. It's easy to understand, it's generally reliable, it's
> fairly easy to debug if something isn't right. But I also recognise
> that others
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" writes:
> On 01.11.2015 14:52, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> It's also strangely schizophrenic as there's no point in zero-filling
>> the entire structure prior to initializing its members one by one
>> which implies zero-filling the larger part of the second one[*]
On 01.11.2015 14:52, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> It's also strangely schizophrenic as there's no point in zero-filling
> the entire structure prior to initializing its members one by one
> which implies zero-filling the larger part of the second one[*]
> again.
That's called "defensive programming"
Le 31/10/2015 17:54, Isaac Dunham a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>How do you guys like this:?
>http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
:), though I hadn't heard about it despite being on the Busybox list.
A lot
Rainer Weikusat writes:
[...]
> memset(&sun, 0, sizeof(&sun.sun_path));
The second & is wrong here.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Adam Borowski writes:
> How do you guys like this:?
> http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
I think that's a silly reason for removing a feature. But I found
something nicer while doing a (minimal) bit of research on sd_listen:
,
| union {
|
yes, you are right. there are plenty more posts that I could have used for an
example.
no disrespect to the folks working hard on Devuan related projects. you are
doing great work.
--seth
> On 01 Nov 2015, at 10:27, Jack L. Frost wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:29:31AM +0100, sth wr
posts like this are the reason I decided to switch to an existing distribution
that doesn't use systemd rather than wait for Devuan.
--seth
> On 31 Oct 2015, at 20:14, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
>
> 2015-10-31 17:30 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski :
>> How do you guys like this:?
>> http://git.busybox.n
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:29:31AM +0100, sth wrote:
> posts like this are the reason I decided to switch to an existing
> distribution that doesn't use systemd rather than wait for Devuan.
Seriously? There are much worse posts on here, but you chose “top lel” as an
example?
signature.asc
Desc
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:10:29 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > How do you guys like this:?
> > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
>
> Quoting from the commit:
> "systemd people are not willing
2015-10-31 17:30 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski :
> How do you guys like this:?
> http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
Top lel
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
Any more details on why exactly they removed this code? I'd like to know more,
and that commit message isn't exactly clear.
-Jonathan
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 2:10 PM, Svante Signell
wrote:
On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> How do you guys like this:?
On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> How do you guys like this:?
> http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
Quoting from the commit:
"systemd people are not willing to play nice with the rest of the world.
Therefore there is no reason
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> How do you guys like this:?
> http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
:), though I hadn't heard about it despite being on the Busybox list.
A lot of the people over there are *at least* as o
How do you guys like this:?
http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346
--
⢎⣉⠂⠠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠠⡅⠀⠤⡧⠄⡄⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠠⡅⠀⡠⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⢴⠍⠀⡠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠤⡧⠄⣇⠤⡀⡠⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⡄⡠⠤⡀⠠⠤⡀⡇⡠⠄⠀⠀⠀
⠢⠤⠃⠪⠭⠇⠇⠀⠇⠀⠣⠀⠀⠣⠄⠨⠭⠃⠣⠀⠬⠭⠂⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠣⠤⠃⠇⠀⠀⠣⠄⠇⠀⠇⠫⠭⠁⠀⠀⠀⠣⠣⠃⠫⠭⠁⠪⠭⠇⠏⠢⠄⠀⠄⠀
(https://github.com/kilobyte/braillefont fo
26 matches
Mail list logo
