On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote:
> I don't have a fast enough i686 machine with Devuan.. it needs 1.5GB of ram
> at least. Maybe a version compiled on Ubuntu 16 works?
Setup a i686 chroot on amd64. Either that, or a virtual machine with a
i686 guest. No nee
Hi "Tux"
tuxd3v wrote:
If someone is interested.. I can use also some help, no tot hijack this
One nice thing would be deb packages for it, on i686:)
I don't have a fast enough i686 machine with Devuan.. it needs 1.5GB of
ram at least. Maybe a version compiled on Ubuntu 16 works?
For me i
Hello Aitor,
aitor wrote:
The issue was the same as you pointed out: that is, the version of the
compiler. It worked for me
only with gcc-6. Trying with gcc-7 the build process ends upwith the
mentioned non declared functions.
No idea about a possible solution so far.About the missing symbol
Citando aitor :
Hi Riccardo,
On 13/5/20 9:47, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
The issue was the same as you pointed out: that is, the version of
the compiler. It worked for me
only with gcc-6. Trying with gcc-7 the build process ends up with
the mentioned non declared functions.
No idea about a poss
Hi Riccardo,
On 13/5/20 9:47, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi Aitor,
aitor wrote:
... or the requirement of a C linkage?
Forget that, the origin of the issue is in the mozconfig file, i guess.
what was the issue? please tell me.
I get missing symbols if I use any compiler newer than gcc 6.5 o
Hi!
aitor wrote:
>
> I have ArcticFox working on amd64:
>
> http://gnuinos.org/arcticfox/arcticfox.png
>
> http://gnuinos.org/arcticfox/beta-devuan.png
>
> Here you are the tarball:
>
> gnuinos.org/arcticfox/arcticfox_amd64.tar.bz2
>
wonderful!
Riccardo
Hi Aitor,
aitor wrote:
>>
>>
>> ... or the requirement of a C linkage?
>>
>
> Forget that, the origin of the issue is in the mozconfig file, i guess.
>
what was the issue? please tell me.
I get missing symbols if I use any compiler newer than gcc 6.5 on linux
(e.g. gcc 7, gcc8).
So on Devuan/
Hi,
On 10/5/20 21:52, aitor wrote:
On 10/5/20 15:17, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:41, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:12, aitor wrote:
After three hours building arcticfox, i've got a lot of
unreferenced rand, srand and strtol:
https://paste.debian.net/1145954/
Any hints?
Aitor.
On 10/5/20 15:17, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:41, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:12, aitor wrote:
After three hours building arcticfox, i've got a lot of unreferenced
rand, srand and strtol:
https://paste.debian.net/1145954/
Any hints?
Aitor.
Some missing stdlib.h and time.h hea
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:41, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:12, aitor wrote:
After three hours building arcticfox, i've got a lot of unreferenced
rand, srand and strtol:
https://paste.debian.net/1145954/
Any hints?
Aitor.
Some missing stdlib.h and time.h headers in the *.cpp files, maybe?
A
Hi,
On 10/5/20 14:12, aitor wrote:
After three hours building arcticfox, i've got a lot of unreferenced
rand, srand and strtol:
https://paste.debian.net/1145954/
Any hints?
Aitor.
Some missing stdlib.h and time.h headers in the *.cpp files, maybe?
Aitor.
__
Hi,
On 9/5/20 7:06, aitor wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 9/5/20 2:49, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2020 01:16:39 +0200
RIccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
On 08/05/2020 22:34, Steve Litt wrote:
However, it looks like Arcticfox isn't available for just plain
amd64 Linux. All sorts of Mac, Windows, even L
Hi Steve,
On 9/5/20 2:49, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2020 01:16:39 +0200
RIccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
On 08/05/2020 22:34, Steve Litt wrote:
However, it looks like Arcticfox isn't available for just plain
amd64 Linux. All sorts of Mac, Windows, even Linux on Power PC, but
no Linux on Wi
On Fri, 8 May 2020 15:59:27 +0200
Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote:
>
> interesting. I drop a line for ArcticFox then, since I am currently its
> main contributor.
>
> A very much improved fork of PaleMoon 27 which is quite lighweight and
> works.
> I am working quite a bit with it on Devuan amd
On Sat, 9 May 2020 01:16:39 +0200
RIccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/05/2020 22:34, Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > However, it looks like Arcticfox isn't available for just plain
> > amd64 Linux. All sorts of Mac, Windows, even Linux on Power PC, but
> > no Linux on Wintel type platforms. Pleas
Hi,
On 08/05/2020 22:34, Steve Litt wrote:
Arctic fox is a fork of PaleMoon. This is a good thing, because I and a
whole bunch of people dropped PaleMoon when PaleMoon's "executives"
issued lawyer threats to the OpenBSD project.
rest assured, no such restrictions for Arctic Fox.
We offer no
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> Arctic fox is a fork of PaleMoon. This is a good thing, because I and a
> whole bunch of people dropped PaleMoon when PaleMoon's "executives"
> issued lawyer threats to the OpenBSD project.
I'll say just one more time, because you tend to ignore t
On Fri, 8 May 2020 15:59:27 +0200
Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote:
> interesting. I drop a line for ArcticFox then, since I am currently
> its main contributor.
>
> A very much improved fork of PaleMoon 27 which is quite lighweight
> and works.
Arctic fox is a fork of PaleMoon. This is a good t
Hi,
aitor_czr wrote:
Tar is installed by default in the core system of devuan (first and
second stages of debootstrap.
In any case, i started working on my own minimalist browser. It's not
a joke:
http://www.gnuinos.org/screenshots/Screenshot_2020-04-11_18-14-41.png
At least, i only need a
Hi Hendrik,
El 2020-04-13 a las 15:19, Hendrik Boom escribió:
Very interesting that you're building a minimalist browser.
What existing software stack are you building it on?
-- hendrik
Gtk and libwebkit, but i'm also looking for other possible alternatives,
because Webkit
(distributed und
Hi,
El 2020-04-14 a las 04:18, spiralofhope escribió:
Related: Tabbed
Simple generic tabbed frontend to xembed-aware applications, originally
designed for surf but also usable with many other applications..
http://tools.suckless.org/tabbed/
Thanks a lot for the link, it seems to be interest
Le 14/04/2020 à 15:27, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:03:56AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
Please note that su has changed as from Beowulf. By default it does
not set the full path. You need to invoke 'su -l' to get /sbin and
/usr/sbin in the path. This may cause some surpr
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:03:56AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 14/04/2020 à 09:34, Dimitris via Dng a écrit :
> > hey,
> >
> > On 4/14/20 10:23 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
> > > I upgraded Ascii to Beowulf and successfully used the new version of
> > > Waterfox. However, there are certain
Le 14/04/2020 à 09:34, Dimitris via Dng a écrit :
hey,
On 4/14/20 10:23 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
I upgraded Ascii to Beowulf and successfully used the new version of
Waterfox. However, there are certain issues like a missing copy of
dpkg-reconfigure.
does running `/usr/sbin/dpkg-reco
hey,
On 4/14/20 10:23 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
> I upgraded Ascii to Beowulf and successfully used the new version of
> Waterfox. However, there are certain issues like a missing copy of
> dpkg-reconfigure.
does running `/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure` work?
that could happen because of
Hi,
I upgraded Ascii to Beowulf and successfully used the new version of
Waterfox. However, there are certain issues like a missing copy of
dpkg-reconfigure. I also noticed that Beowulf now comes with more
stringent security. A side effect of the increased security caused my
version of simple-neta
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:04:45 +
aitor_czr wrote:
> http://www.gnuinos.org/screenshots/Screenshot_2020-04-11_18-14-41.png
> At least, i only need a few features like management for my bookmarks
> and ability to have several websites opened at the same time in
> different tabs.
Related: Tabbed
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 07:04:45PM +, aitor_czr wrote:
> In any case, i started working on my own minimalist browser. It's not a
> joke:
>
> http://www.gnuinos.org/screenshots/Screenshot_2020-04-11_18-14-41.png
Very interesting that you're building a minimalist browser.
What existing softwar
On 4/12/20 2:32 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will upgrade to Beowulf. As usual, I will upgrade dpkg, apt,
> aptitude and the kernel first and then reboot with the new versions.
> Then, I will do an "apt-get dist-upgrade".
>
> If there are more critical packages which need to be u
Hi,
I will upgrade to Beowulf. As usual, I will upgrade dpkg, apt,
aptitude and the kernel first and then reboot with the new versions.
Then, I will do an "apt-get dist-upgrade".
If there are more critical packages which need to be upgraded first,
please post. The above worked in Debian when ther
Hello Edward,
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask whether Devuan and Waterfox are still compatible.
> Updates of Waterfox are not working. I tried the classic version as
> the new one may have more issues.
>
> The 'old' version of waterfox I am using freezes the mouse pointer on startup.
>
> The erro
On 4/11/20 7:04 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
But i wonder if libwebkitgtk-1.0 (compatible with Gtk2) will survive
the passing of time and dbus.
The answer is blowin' in the wind :)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bi
Hi Edward,
On 4/11/20 5:40 PM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
Hi,
I tried to extract the contents of the current .tar.gz2 archive in
/opt as suggested but failed with the following error:
-ERROR-
# tar xjf waterfox-current-2020.04.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 .
tar: .: Not found in archiv
On Saturday, 11 April at 19:40, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
Hi,
I tried to extract the contents of the current .tar.gz2 archive in
/opt as suggested but failed with the following error:
-ERROR-
# tar xjf waterfox-current-2020.04.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 .
tar: .: Not found in archiv
Hi,
I tried to extract the contents of the current .tar.gz2 archive in
/opt as suggested but failed with the following error:
-ERROR-
# tar xjf waterfox-current-2020.04.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 .
tar: .: Not found in archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
--
Hi Edward,
On 4/11/20 11:50 AM, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask whether Devuan and Waterfox are still compatible.
Updates of Waterfox are not working. I tried the classic version as
the new one may have more issues.
The 'old' version of waterfox I am using freezes the mou
Hi,
I would like to ask whether Devuan and Waterfox are still compatible.
Updates of Waterfox are not working. I tried the classic version as
the new one may have more issues.
The 'old' version of waterfox I am using freezes the mouse pointer on startup.
The error is the following:
ERRO
37 matches
Mail list logo
