On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 21:10:08 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> And did iptables work after the whole upgrade was finished?
Yes. My existing ruleset was replaced with the default (permissive)
ruleset; thus by definition, iptables worked as intended by the
developers. However, as a manual iptables-resto
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:46:16 +0200
Ludovic Bellière wrote:
> Running processes aren't stopped (restarted) until the new binaries
> are available, so your machine was still behind a firewall if rules
> were applied before the upgrade. iptables, ip6tables, and other
> alternatives serves as interfa
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:46:21AM +0100, fraser kendall wrote:
> I have upgraded several machines to Beowulf over the last few months.
> It has only once been problematic, but that was probably due to student
> error. However, there is an ongoing issue with the upgrade to
> iptables-nft so before
Hello kendall.
Running processes aren't stopped (restarted) until the new binaries are
available, so your machine was still behind a firewall if rules were
applied before the upgrade. iptables, ip6tables, and other alternatives
serves as interface to the Netfilter packet filtering framework found
I have upgraded several machines to Beowulf over the last few months.
It has only once been problematic, but that was probably due to student
error. However, there is an ongoing issue with the upgrade to
iptables-nft so before starting the upgrade I opened a separate
terminal and issued # watch ip
