Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> As Arnt Karlsen mentioned in the Bootloaders thread, there a new twist
> which is the result of a security fix
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/10/linux_tor_users_open_corrupted_communications/
>
> In a bid to thwart the risk from injected
I wrote:
> Go Linux wrote:
>
>> For those of you so inclined. Is this important, old news or just academic
>> posturing?
>
> I think it's all three !
> It looks very much related to a CVE from 2004
> https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2004-0230
OK, so it now looks like it
Go Linux wrote:
> For those of you so inclined. Is this important, old news or just academic
> posturing?
I think it's all three !
It looks very much related to a CVE from 2004
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2004-0230
Fundamentally, if someone can spoof a packet with t
For those of you so inclined. Is this important, old news or just academic
posturing?
golinux
--
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160809143253.htm
Serious security threat to many Internet users highlighted
Communications involving Linux