It works, thanks !!
Aitor.
On 22/08/15 16:58, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
"Use it as intended"? In case you want to create a package installing
something in /usr/local (eg, because it's a "local" package not intended
for standalone distribution), the dh_usrlocal step can be skipped:
binary:
Thaks, i will try it.
Aitor.
On 22/08/15 16:58, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
"Use it as intended"? In case you want to create a package installing
something in /usr/local (eg, because it's a "local" package not intended
for standalone distribution), the dh_usrlocal step can be skipped:
binary:
aitor_czr writes:
> Recently i debianized the latest release of bulmages (acounting and
> invoicing program) in Qt5:
>
> http://gnuinos.org/release16/?dir=devuan/pool/main/b/bulmages
>
> And i had the following issue: the resulting packages were all empty!
> This was due to the fact that the late
On 08/22/2015 11:54 AM, Riccardo Boninsegna wrote:
[...]
If that program's source has a ./configure program, you may be able to
fix the problem by adding this argument → --prefix=/ ←
(Don't ask me how to do have dpkg-buildpackage do that, though!)
In debian/rules:
override_dh_auto_configure:
Il 22/ago/2015 10:40 AM, "aitor_czr" ha scritto:
> the resulting packages were all empty! This was due to the fact that the
latest release is located in /usr/local, so i had to comment with some
lines in the dh_usrlocal script
Well, packages are not supposed to put anything in /usr/local (so it c
Recently i debianized the latest release of bulmages (acounting and
invoicing program) in Qt5:
http://gnuinos.org/release16/?dir=devuan/pool/main/b/bulmages
And i had the following issue: the resulting packages were all empty!
This was due to the fact that the latest release is located in
/us
