I wrote:
> If you used an MUA that supported proper list-reply, you wouldn't
> need to 'change your To: line', either. (I haven't checked headers
> to see if your MUA is revealed, there. If you _do_ use mutt, switch
> to doing list-reply.)
Claws-Mail -- and, in Web-searching to see whether tha
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> And now for my netiquette nit, addressed to all list inhabitants...
>
> Don't email me and copy the list. Don't email the list and copy me.
In fairness, some MUAs (such as mutt) make it easy to comply with this
request. Many do not. mutt makes
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 01:39:47 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:06:05 +
> > aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > What about fixing your computer clock (again). This was sent
> > > > Fri, 2017- 12-08 at 01:23 +0100 and
On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:06:05 +
> aitor_czr wrote:
>
>
> > > What about fixing your computer clock (again). This was sent Fri,
> > > 2017- 12-08 at 01:23 +0100 and now is Sat Dec 9 01:49:45 CET
> > > 2017., i.e. Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:49:45
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:06:05 +
aitor_czr wrote:
> > What about fixing your computer clock (again). This was sent Fri,
> > 2017- 12-08 at 01:23 +0100 and now is Sat Dec 9 01:49:45 CET
> > 2017., i.e. Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:49:45 +0100 You are a day behind:(
>
> You are right... I sent quite a
Dear Svante,
On 09/12/17 00:55, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi again,
What about fixing your computer clock (again). This was sent Fri, 2017-
12-08 at 01:23 +0100 and now is Sat Dec 9 01:49:45 CET 2017., i.e.
Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:49:45 +0100 You are a day behind:(
You are right... I sent quite anno
On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 01:23 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 12/09/2017 12:47 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hi aitor,
> >
> > Looking at the above it was a small nitpick, i.e. a typo in my
> > understanding, not a harsh comment.
> >
> > Have a nice day/night :)
>
> trololosh ..., anybody can exp
On 12/09/2017 12:47 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi aitor,
Looking at the above it was a small nitpick, i.e. a typo in my
understanding, not a harsh comment.
Have a nice day/night:)
trololosh ..., anybody can explain me what meens trololosh? I can't
find it in google
__
On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 18:23 +, aitor_czr wrote:
> > (just a small nitpick: My last name is Signell, with two l's in the
> > end)
>
> No need to be harsh..., it was just a typo.
Hi aitor,
Looking at the above it was a small nitpick, i.e. a typo in my
understanding, not a harsh comment.
Hav
Dear Svante,
On 02/12/17 20:49, Svante Signelll wrote:
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 17:19 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
On 1st Dec 2017, Svante Signel wrote:
"This is a last warning. If you are continuing to not quote previous
mails, I'll never reply to a posting from you again. Learn some
netiquette!"
Quoting Edward Bartolo (edb...@gmail.com):
> Sorry, I had no intention to be rude. Gmail makes quoting preceeding
> emails redundant, so this is a problem that I am not directly aware
> of, as I can always easily access previous emails in the same thread.
This may help:
http://smallbusiness.chron
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 17:19 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> On 1st Dec 2017, Svante Signel wrote:
> "This is a last warning. If you are continuing to not quote previous
> mails, I'll never reply to a posting from you again. Learn some
> netiquette!"
>
> Sorry, I had no intention to be rude. Gmail m
On 1st Dec 2017, Svante Signel wrote:
"This is a last warning. If you are continuing to not quote previous mails, I'll
never reply to a posting from you again. Learn some netiquette!"
Sorry, I had no intention to be rude. Gmail makes quoting preceeding
emails redundant, so this is a problem that I
On Friday 1. December 2017 11.10.57 Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> This is a last warning. If you are continuing to not quote previous mails,
> I'll never reply to a posting from you again. Learn some netiquette!
>
> On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 10:46 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> > These are th
Hi again,
This is a last warning. If you are continuing to not quote previous mails, I'll
never reply to a posting from you again. Learn some netiquette!
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 10:46 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> These are the results.
For what? With udev installed (which eudev version are you
These are the results. The first listing lists only two files while
the second lists all files.
edbarx@edbarx-pc3:~$ find /lib/udev/rules.d/ -name '*usb*'
/lib/udev/rules.d/39-usbmuxd.rules
/lib/udev/rules.d/73-usb-net-by-mac.rules
edbarx@edbarx-pc3:~$ find /lib/udev/hwdb.d/ -name '*usb*'
/lib/ud
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 09:31 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> This installation was done on ASCII.
>
> Before this installation Thunar used to auto-list USB thumbdrives.
> Running pstree shown udevd is running instead of eudevd although I do
> not know whether eudev and udev use exactly the same name
This installation was done on ASCII.
Before this installation Thunar used to auto-list USB thumbdrives.
Running pstree shown udevd is running instead of eudevd although I do
not know whether eudev and udev use exactly the same name for the
daemon.
Any help will make a difference. Thanks goes to a
18 matches
Mail list logo
