On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:01:42PM +0200, Paweł Cholewiński wrote:
> Look here https://git.devuan.org/devuan-packages/debian-installer/issues
> Some issues have 1.0.0-beta2 milestone and they are going to be resolved
> with beta2.
Ok, thanks. I didn't see that in my search, and filed installer iss
W dniu 08.06.2016 o 22:22, Gregory Nowak pisze:
>> please remember critical feedback and insights are welcome! we need
>> > to improve things still. but perhaps not in the d-i installer, which
>> > is quite of an hairball.
> Does that mean that feedback issues open against the installer aren't
> g
W dniu 07.06.2016 o 12:38, emnin...@riseup.net pisze:
> (How can i debug the installation?)
You could use this document:
https://git.devuan.org/dev1fanboy/Upgrade-Install-Devuan/wikis/Minimal-install-guide
Use debootstrap --variant=minbase --include=nano,nvi,procps jessie
/target http://auto.mirr
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
> please remember critical feedback and insights are welcome! we need
> to improve things still. but perhaps not in the d-i installer, which
> is quite of an hairball.
Does that mean that feedback issues open against the installer aren't
go
On 08/06/16 03:23, Jaromil wrote:
but perhaps not in the d-i installer, which
is quite of an hairball.
Steel Pulse :-)
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Simon Walter wrote:
> OK, well, I just tried the new BETA.
please remember critical feedback and insights are welcome! we need
to improve things still. but perhaps not in the d-i installer, which
is quite of an hairball.
> I don't know why there is a graphical installer. My
On 06/08/2016 12:15 PM, Simon Walter wrote:
On 06/07/2016 07:38 PM, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Am Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:33:08 +
schrieb Simon Walter :
I have not noticed this. What are the models of your notebook
computers?
You could do everyone a favour and debug it a little. Do you know
On 06/07/2016 07:38 PM, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Am Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:33:08 +
schrieb Simon Walter :
I have not noticed this. What are the models of your notebook
computers?
You could do everyone a favour and debug it a little. Do you know
which process was spinning the CPU?
a Samsung
Am Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:33:08 +
schrieb Simon Walter :
> I have not noticed this. What are the models of your notebook
> computers?
>
> You could do everyone a favour and debug it a little. Do you know
> which process was spinning the CPU?
a Samsung NP535U3C (amd processor and graphics)
a So
On 06/07/2016 02:45 PM, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Finally i succeeded in installing a devuan ascii into qemu (running on
an archlinux openrc system).
And here too, i noticed that the debian installer is somehow "extreme"
in using ressources. Note this is *NOT* an amd graphics based machine
but
Finally i succeeded in installing a devuan ascii into qemu (running on
an archlinux openrc system).
And here too, i noticed that the debian installer is somehow "extreme"
in using ressources. Note this is *NOT* an amd graphics based machine
but a sony_vaio with nvidia graphics. (On another laptop,
On 05/11/2016 09:15 PM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
Hi Aitor
There 2 ways to customise the debian-install theme in live-build. I looked
at changing the theme in rootskel-gtk years ago, but I found these methods
less painful, It uses cpio.
1. a hook + another folder binary_debian-installer, with the
Hi Aitor
There 2 ways to customise the debian-install theme in live-build. I looked
at changing the theme in rootskel-gtk years ago, but I found these methods
less painful, It uses cpio.
1. a hook + another folder binary_debian-installer, with the theme. The
hook could also be used to remove the
Hi Aitor
I forget there is also a hook for method 2. It's only a few lines to remove
the text installer and add a hard link. It's a trimmed down version of the
hook from method 1.
Cheers
Ozi
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Ozi Traveller
wrote:
> Hi Aitor
>
> There 2 ways to customise the debia
On 05/07/2016 06:25 PM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
Hi All,
During the last week I tried to install Devuan on a desktop computer
powered by a Pentium Dual Core and 3 GB of RAM but failed. I tried to
install Devuan 64 bit (Jessie).
The installer is assuming one is using LVM that I never use. I had to
Hi All,
During the last week I tried to install Devuan on a desktop computer
powered by a Pentium Dual Core and 3 GB of RAM but failed. I tried to
install Devuan 64 bit (Jessie).
The installer is assuming one is using LVM that I never use. I had to
instead install Debian Jessie 64 bit and then co
On 05/06/2016 04:40 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
>On 05/06/2016 07:28 AM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
>> >Does the Devuan graphical installer still support a banner across the top
>> >of the screen?
>Of course, configuring the .udeb skeleton package.
The package is "rootskel-gtk". I did something mounth
Hi Ozi,
On 05/06/2016 04:40 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
On 05/06/2016 07:28 AM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
>Does the Devuan graphical installer still support a banner across the top
>of the screen?
Of course, configuring the .udeb skeleton package.
You can also do that using CPIO [*]:
Copy 'install/g
On 05/06/2016 07:28 AM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
Does the Devuan graphical installer still support a banner across the top
of the screen?
Of course, configuring the .udeb skeleton package.
I still didn't find time to try the beta of devuan, but i will do this
weekend.
Thanks for your work to
Hi
Does the Devuan graphical installer still support a banner across the top
of the screen? Or is this an issue with beta or coming from debian?
I'm using live-build wth jessie.
Cheers
Ozi
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dy
On 03/29/2016 10:10 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Boruch Baum writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> 4] The third set of downloads, for the additional system components,
>> should have been the easy lift. What I did was deselect the options for
>> a desktop and for a print server, expecting the system to want to
Boruch Baum writes:
[...]
> 4] The third set of downloads, for the additional system components,
> should have been the easy lift. What I did was deselect the options for
> a desktop and for a print server, expecting the system to want to
> download ~273 files, as it did on prior tests. At that
On 03/29/2016 12:33 AM, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:30:42PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
>> 4.1] Was it a case of 'fat-fingerng'? I don't think so, but it's
>> asking a lot to attempt to re-create this because with slow
>> bandwidth, each install attempt takes a long time to get
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:30:42PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> 4.1] Was it a case of 'fat-fingerng'? I don't think so, but it's asking
> a lot to attempt to re-create this because with slow bandwidth, each
> install attempt takes a long time to get to this stage. Today's
> connection was especially
Short version: From the screen that lets the user select specific system
components to install, eg. XFCE, print server, SSH server, when I tabbed
to the selection "go back" with the intention of getting the main menu,
what happened instead was the installer began downloading "1173
packages". The on
25 matches
Mail list logo
