Re: [DNG] DNS at startup

2016-08-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:12:02 -0400 Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:25:01AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > > > > There shouldn't IMO be broken DNS any more on modern networked *ix > > hosts. Run a local recursive resolver and list 127.0.0.1 as the > > first resolv.conf entry. It's

Re: [DNG] DNS at startup

2016-08-15 Thread richard lucassen
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:12:02 -0400 Hendrik Boom wrote: > > There shouldn't IMO be broken DNS any more on modern networked *ix > > hosts. Run a local recursive resolver and list 127.0.0.1 as the > > first resolv.conf entry. It's 2016, guys. > > Why isn't a local resolver the default? Why do w

Re: [DNG] DNS at startup

2016-08-15 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com): > Why isn't a local resolver the default? Why do we rely on the ISP to > do provide one with DHCP? I like the way you think, sir! ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-

[DNG] DNS at startup

2016-08-15 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:25:01AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > > There shouldn't IMO be broken DNS any more on modern networked *ix > hosts. Run a local recursive resolver and list 127.0.0.1 as the first > resolv.conf entry. It's 2016, guys. Why isn't a local resolver the default? Why do we rel