[DNG] Backports priority

2017-02-26 Thread J. Fahrner
According to this documentation: https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ Backports should have a priority of 100 in the Release file: " /All backports are deactivated by default (i.e. the packages are pinned to 100 by using ButAutomaticUpgrades: yes in the Release files"/ This seems

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Florian Zieboll
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:24:45 +0100 Florian Zieboll wrote: > $ mount -o bind /dev "$MESSEDUPROOTFS"/dev > > $ mount -t proc none "$MESSEDUPROOTFS"/proc > > $ mount -t sysfs none "$MESSEDUPROOTFS"/sys > > $ chroot "$MESSEDUPROOTFS" I forgot to mention: If you have a separate boot partition, o

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Florian Zieboll
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:52:51 +0200 Lars Noodén wrote: > On 01/28/2017 02:16 PM, Joachim Fahrner wrote: > > Hello Florian, > > > > > > Am 28.01.2017 um 12:33 schrieb Florian Zieboll: > [...] > > > > I know that, but I was used this is a default in Debian. In Devuan > > this is not a defaul

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Lars Noodén
On 01/28/2017 02:16 PM, Joachim Fahrner wrote: > Hello Florian, > > > Am 28.01.2017 um 12:33 schrieb Florian Zieboll: >> to avoid accidents like this, I have the following lines in my apt >> preferences: >> >>Package: * >>Pin: release a=jessie-backports >>Pin-Priority: 150 > > I know

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Joachim Fahrner
Hello Florian, Am 28.01.2017 um 12:33 schrieb Florian Zieboll: > to avoid accidents like this, I have the following lines in my apt > preferences: > >Package: * >Pin: release a=jessie-backports >Pin-Priority: 150 > > I know that, but I was used this is a default in Debian. In Dev

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Joachim Fahrner
Am 28.01.2017 um 11:08 schrieb Adam Borowski: > Temporarily bump the priority of stable above 1000, it will downgrade > everything to that release. > Thank you! That works great, except downgrading of mysql-server from 5.6 to 5.5 was not possible. Maybe there is something incompatible in database

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Florian Zieboll
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:58:30 +0100 Joachim Fahrner wrote: > Hi, > > I added Devuan backports and now a lot of packages were upgraded to > the new bpo version. Normally Debian backports should have a priority > of 100 and should not automatically upgrade. What is wrong here? > > Is there an easy

Re: [DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote: > I added Devuan backports and now a lot of packages were upgraded to the > new bpo version. Normally Debian backports should have a priority of 100 > and should not automatically upgrade. What is wrong here? > > Is there an easy way

[DNG] Backports priority

2017-01-28 Thread Joachim Fahrner
Hi, I added Devuan backports and now a lot of packages were upgraded to the new bpo version. Normally Debian backports should have a priority of 100 and should not automatically upgrade. What is wrong here? Is there an easy way to downgrade packages to the stable version? -- Mit besten Grüßen J

[DNG] backports priority

2016-04-26 Thread fsmithred
The priority on backports is set to 990. Please, could that be decreased to prevent accidental flooding of backports packages during an upgrade? In wheezy the priority is 100, so you only get what you ask for (and its deps, I think.) Should I file this as an issue at git.devuan.org? Thanks, fsr _