Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Rainer Weikusat wrote: > I'd still like an answer to this question: For the common use case of a > so-called "desktop system", why should system processes be hidden from > its owner by default unless said owner does something which is actively > discouraged, IOW, "Who is trying to hide what here

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Rainer Weikusat writes: > "Jack L. Frost" writes: >> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: >>> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >>> >>> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >>> >>> This has the effect of keeping the specifi

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Boruch Baum writes: > On 04/07/2016 01:05 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> "Jack L. Frost" writes: >>> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >>

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

On 04/07/2016 01:05 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > "Jack L. Frost" writes: >> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: >>> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >>> >>> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >>> >>> This has the effect o

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

"Jack L. Frost" writes: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: >> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >> >> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >> >> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids, >> comm

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Jack L. Frost : >On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: >> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >> >> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >> >> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids, >> command l

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:17:32PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote: > Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: > > proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 > > This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids, > command lines and parameters of a use

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Boruch Baum writes: - some clarifications as I tend to forget how far remove from 'everyday experiences' this stuff happens to be - > On 04/04/2016 11:22 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: [...] >> [*] "Everyday real-world example": One of the things I'm dealing with >> is a proprietary racoon fork

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Boruch Baum writes: > On 04/04/2016 11:22 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> Boruch Baum writes: >>> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >>> >>> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >>> >>> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process >

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

On 04/04/2016 11:22 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: >> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: >> >> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 >> >> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process >> ids, command lines and para

Re: [DNG] Another multi-user issue

Boruch Baum writes: > Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: > > proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 > > This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids, > command lines and parameters of a user from other users. If you think that's u

[DNG] Another multi-user issue

Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include: proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2 This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids, command lines and parameters of a user from other users. If you're not familiar with this, even if you don't