Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba
Hi Haines, El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:43:29 -0500 Haines Brown escribió: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:10:24PM +0100, Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba > wrote: > > Hi Haines, > > > > El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500 > > Haines Brown escribió: > > > > > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases wi

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:10:24PM +0100, Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba wrote: > Hi Haines, > > El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500 > Haines Brown escribió: > > > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard > > entries, but don't know how it got there [...] > > It is co

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Luciano Mannucci
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:28:11 -0500 Haines Brown wrote: > Antony, its not in my /etc/mail/aliases. In your case, your sendmail > probably created it. But for those not using sendmail, is > the /etc/aliases file no longer userful or needed? I'm running postfix that uses it. Maybe other mtas too..

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba
Hi Haines, El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500 Haines Brown escribió: > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard > entries, but don't know how it got there [...] It is commony created during the installation by debian-installer (and I see that devuan-installer does the s

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:28:11AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: [cut] > > > Antony, its not in my /etc/mail/aliases. In your case, your sendmail > probably created it. But for those not using sendmail, is > the /etc/aliases file no longer userful or needed? > Dear Haines, as you know, /etc/

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:21:46PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2018 at 13:18:35, Haines Brown wrote: > > > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard > > entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or > > procmail, but did run exi

Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Antony Stone
On Wednesday 12 December 2018 at 13:18:35, Haines Brown wrote: > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard > entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or > procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in > devuan ASCII (where I also

[DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in devuan ASCII (where I also run exim4). Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide