KatolaZ freaknet.org> writes:
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:01:36PM +0000, Luke Leighton wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > what you *don't* want to happen is to fall into exactly the same trap
> > of forcing people into all-or-nothing decisions. we&#x
hellekin dyne.org> writes:
> The version you wrote, that I reported as Issue #8, wants to tell a
> different story than what has been told so far. The project description
> clearly states that:
>
> + *removing mandatory dependencies on systemd* is the primary goal
> + in order to reach that goa
Dragan FOSS gmx.com> writes:
> >
> > i would be most grateful therefore if you could make it much more
> > convenient for me to be able to do this, whilst still keeping all the
> > debian, TDE and deb-multimedia repositories in /etc/apt/sources.list
> > that i have today, by keeping the devuan p
Gravis adaptivetime.com> writes:
>
> > * returning to manual keyboard and mouse configuration in Xorg
>
> where did it move to before?
i never removed the manual keyboard and mouse configuration
options that i had installed years back. however as xorg has
grown more features, one of them
karl please refresh and double-check the update for pulseaudio,
i spotted that two mentions of libsystemd dev packages are
still in the pulseaudio debian/control file.
having removed those (locally) and reinstalled the resultant packages,
i've just been able to successfully remove libsystemd0:amd6
T.J. Duchene gmail.com> writes:
>
> If I might add my opinion to the discussion, I will be very clear in saying
> that even attempting to stay somewhat in sync with Debian is a waste of
> valuable time and effort, and deserves a resounding “No” vote.
haaang on... :)
> the subject of systemd
aspodata.se> writes:
>
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl.net>:
> > http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
>
> I'll try that.
awesome. if you'd like to keep in touch (through this list
if that's ok with the dng team?) i can perhaps advise if you
get stuck. it would be in
hellekin dyne.org> writes:
>
> On 02/14/2015 10:16 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:12 AM, KatolaZ freaknet.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:01:58PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> >
> >>> is it the intent of the devuan team to:
> >
Hendrik Boom topoi.pooq.com> writes:
> Wasn't the initial plan to have a Devuan repository that could be added
> to the existing Debian repositories (but pinned to higher priority)
> so we could focus on changing what needed changing, but not waste time
> on replicating *everything*?
that is
Gravis adaptivetime.com> writes:
>
> > well, here's what _can_ assure that the transition will be at least
> > not complete hell and requiring a total abandonment of devuan for
> > debian and vice-versa (i.e. a total and complete wipe-down of a hard
> > drive and a reinstall from scratch):
>
>
KatolaZ freaknet.org> writes:
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:46:42PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > Fork is permanent only as long as the two branches do not later converge
and rejoin.
>
> Yes, I know that, but have you ever seen anything similar happening in
> the past?
no - but that is,
11 matches
Mail list logo
