On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> hiya folks,
>
> i just managed to get the cubieboard's image unpacked and installed on
> an EOMA68-A20 computer card
> https://files.devuan.org/devuan_jessie_beta/
okay so this was successful, and i now
hiya folks,
i just managed to get the cubieboard's image unpacked and installed on
an EOMA68-A20 computer card
https://files.devuan.org/devuan_jessie_beta/
it was pretty straightforward, involved losetup -P, and it was nice to
see that there's a very minimalist base of packages preinstalled in
th
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:34:58AM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
>> ...
>> dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (native)':
>> nati
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 06:21:27PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:30:17PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> &
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:30:17PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> I should have a fix soon.
awesome.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/c
isaac i get "cannot stat /etc/modprobe.d/*" when doing the
update-initramfs -u, hope that's ok...
SPLAT :) dozens of "unknown user/group root:root on line 20 ... about
100 of those...
Gave up on ... hang on let me take a screenshot...
___
Dng mailing li
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:27:55PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
>
> Somehow, this inspired me to poke at packaging mdev.
> I don't have a website or
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jaromil wrote:
> TRIOS is a great effort. I personally use zfs in production and approve their
> technical choices including openrc which I believe to be a good candidate for
> Devuan's future too.
>
> with Devuan we will keep the focus of matching Debian as much
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> On Tue, 2/17/15, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> Subject: [Dng] trios already packaging openrc and removed libsystemd0
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015, 11:49 AM
>
>> http://forums.de
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=119836
!! did anyone have a clue that this has already been done? i
didn't!! :) why is this stuff so hard to find??
l.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> Thanks to your write-up, I've gotten Xorg working sans udev
> (actually, simulated via overmounting with tmpfs and running mdev).
> FYI, *this* was why I included "devinfo" in libsysdev:
> for d in /dev/input/*; do DEV="`devinfo $d`"; [ -e "$
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:28:38PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> > And I've rebuilt
>> > util-linux and removed libsystemd0 already.
>>
>> ohh, you are so lucky! can i add you to t
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:49:54PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> http://slashdot.org/submission/4203115/removing-libsystemd0-from-a-live-running-debian-system
>>
>> if anyone would like to help get the
http://slashdot.org/submission/4203115/removing-libsystemd0-from-a-live-running-debian-system
if anyone would like to help get the word out, as a way to actively
engage more developers and end-users to give them their right to
choose what software to run, please do consider hitting the "+" button
http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
if you recall, yesterday i mentioned that i do not take risks with my
business-critical laptop... except by about 5am i had completed most
of the process of doing precisely that.
the desktop that i run is *not* a normal one, by any means. i r
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:55 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 05:46:03PM +, Luke Leighton wrote:
>
> [very long cut]
>
>>
>> this is again a self-fulfilling statement of intent, where i have
>> demonstrated logically and rationally above that the grounds for the
>> conclusion t
[to richard, top-posted deliberately so that the chances are high that
he will read it] - richard, apologies, i appreciate you are using
gmail which provides a nice clean way to encourage people to top-post,
but in case you have never encountered the reasons why it is bad, may
i suggest you read th
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:12 AM, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:01:58PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> is it the intent of the devuan team to:
>>
>> (a) create a "fork" which will always, at all times, without fail,
>> require
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:40 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:24:54PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>
>> so i just wanted to put that thought into people's minds to consider,
>> as i see quite a lot of potential &
i just read http://lists.devuan.org/dwn/1423732562.11152_1.fork:2,S.html
and i note that there are considerable plans to move away from the way
that things are done in debian (use of jenkins instead of dbuild, and
so on).
first some background: it strikes me that the arrogance and betrayal
of the
20 matches
Mail list logo
