Re: [DNG] Devuan Jessie security maintenance status

2019-05-06 Thread Henry Jensen via Dng
On Fri, 3 May 2019 20:25:25 +0200 Alessandro Selli wrote: > On 03/05/19 at 19:31, Henry Jensen via Dng wrote: > > So, you are using auto.mirror.devuan.org. I did use deb.devuan.org, > > according to https://devuan.org/os/etc/apt/sources.list > > > > "IM

Re: [DNG] Devuan Jessie security maintenance status

2019-05-03 Thread Henry Jensen via Dng
Am Fri, 3 May 2019 12:18:40 -0300 schrieb Gastón via Dng : > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote: > > Am Fri, 3 May 2019 11:52:31 -0300 > > schrieb Gastón via Dng : > > > > > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Henry Jensen via

Re: [DNG] Devuan Jessie security maintenance status

2019-05-03 Thread Henry Jensen via Dng
Am Fri, 3 May 2019 11:52:31 -0300 schrieb Gastón via Dng : > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Henry Jensen via Dng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know that Jessie doesn't get as much attention as stable from a > > security perspective, but is Jessie in Dev

[DNG] Devuan Jessie security maintenance status

2019-05-03 Thread Henry Jensen via Dng
Hi, I know that Jessie doesn't get as much attention as stable from a security perspective, but is Jessie in Devuan still receiving security updates at all? I still have several Devuan Jessie boxes, and they didn't got security updates for weeks. I also have a _Debian_ Jessie box, and this compu

[DNG] non-free activated by default?

2016-11-18 Thread Henry Jensen
Hello, As a long-term Debian user which is sick of systemd I downloaded devuan_jessie_1.0.0-beta_amd64_CD.iso and installed the system without much adjustments. Next thing I noticed is that "non-free" is included by default and I have now non-free packages installed on my system without asking.

Re: [DNG] vdev - udev is a dead end

2016-08-13 Thread Henry Jensen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:51:22AM -0500, dev wrote: > > On 08/10/2016 04:26 AM, Didier Kryn wrote: > > Hello. Thanks to a friendly help, I've found a few mails and > > articles which deserve to be read: > > > > Udev on non-systemd is a dead-end: > > So.. then.. basically any Linux dist