On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:40:46 +0200
Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
> Although all very interesting theories (even some being plausible),
> and although I am inclined to believe any (*any*!) explanation, even
> the oddest, as to *why* this systemd monstruosity exists, all I see
> here is conjecture
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 18:39:19 -0400
Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Oct 01, 2019, Steve Litt wrote:
> > [...]
> > [1] In 2014 I probably had almost as many supporters on Debian-User
> > as haters, but my supporters all left, leaving only the haters.
>
> I don't hate you, and technically am subscribed t
On Oct 01, 2019, Steve Litt wrote:
> [...]
> [1] In 2014 I probably had almost as many supporters on Debian-User as
> haters, but my supporters all left, leaving only the haters.
I don't hate you, and technically am subscribed to debian-user ...
--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/d
(Sorry Hendrik for the double post, but I replied to you personally, and
not the list)
Has it perhaps acquired ties to systemd?
That is most probably why the Devuan team made the initial effort of
recompiling it, yeah.
I was merely wondering why that effort had since stalled.
Upstream sour
The facts with systemd is this. RedHat's business model is to sell
support for their OS. Only problem is that Linux is pretty stable on
it's own. No problems means no support money. That's why they must
replace a perfectly good init system that's worked perfectly for
multiple decades with somethin
No the intent is not to infest GNU/Linux with bugs.
RedHat's aims have not changed from when they first introduced SystemD
and they are achieving them on target which is why IBM bought in.
It is to become the only Distro regardless of name, in effect
the SystemD Operating System. Canonical had be
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:38:27PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Anno domini 2019 Tue, 8 Oct 08:32:22 -0400
> Hendrik Boom scripsit:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:07:11PM +0700, Андрей via Dng wrote:
> > > Приветствую.
> > >
> > >
> > > A question on fonts in testing/unstable.
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
> > So why there 2.3 version is in beowulf while buster's package is 2.4?
>
> FWIU, it seems this package is compiled from Devuan's CI and not merely
> merged from upstream: https://ci.devuan.org/job/openvpn-binaries/
>
> I h
Anno domini 2019 Tue, 8 Oct 08:32:22 -0400
Hendrik Boom scripsit:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:07:11PM +0700, Андрей via Dng wrote:
> > Приветствую.
> >
> >
> > A question on fonts in testing/unstable.
> >
> > To me, fonts in X session are as beatiful as it is in stable -- not
> > thin, nor sha
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:07:11PM +0700, Андрей via Dng wrote:
> Приветствую.
>
>
> A question on fonts in testing/unstable.
>
> To me, fonts in X session are as beatiful as it is in stable -- not
> thin, nor sharp. In case you have same beatiful fonts
> (as in stable) in testing/unstable, woul
Anno domini 2019 Tue, 8 Oct 16:22:38 +0700
Андрей via Dng scripsit:
> Приветствую.
>
>
> В Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:27:25 +0200, ты писал(а):
>
> > When you run something GTK-based, you need "subpixel auto",
> > "antialiasing minimum" and "bitmapfonts yes". If you use TDE, you can
> > use tcontrol an
Приветствую.
В Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:27:25 +0200, ты писал(а):
> When you run something GTK-based, you need "subpixel auto",
> "antialiasing minimum" and "bitmapfonts yes". If you use TDE, you can
> use tcontrol and "subpixel yes", "subpixel ordering RGB",
> "antialiasing myximum".
>
> GTK-based f
So why there 2.3 version is in beowulf while buster's package is 2.4?
FWIU, it seems this package is compiled from Devuan's CI and not merely
merged from upstream: https://ci.devuan.org/job/openvpn-binaries/
I have no idea about what kind of problem made that package not having
been recompil
13 matches
Mail list logo
