Re: [DNG] I wrote IBM

Steve has a perfect right to do this if he wants. However I don't believe it's going to be effective, since red hat will continue to operate independently, so it has the same management as before. I think the most instructive thing I've seen so far is the fact that SpaceX does not use it in their

Re: [DNG] I wrote IBM

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 20:54:09 +0200 Evilham via Dng wrote: > On dg., set. 29 2019, goli...@devuan.org wrote: > > > On 2019-09-28 21:32, Steve Litt wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I just wrote IBM asking them to reconsider systemd, given that > >> IBM's > >> business model is different from the o

Re: [DNG] I wrote IBM

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:29:59 + Aitor wrote: > Hi Steve, > > El 29/9/19 a las 2:32, Steve Litt escribió: > > Hi all, > > > > I just wrote IBM asking them to reconsider systemd, given that IBM's > > business model is different from the old Red Hat's. > > > > It took me 3.5 hours: 2 hours to fi

Re: [DNG] I wrote IBM

Hi Steve, El 29/9/19 a las 2:32, Steve Litt escribió: Hi all, I just wrote IBM asking them to reconsider systemd, given that IBM's business model is different from the old Red Hat's. It took me 3.5 hours: 2 hours to find valid addresses of Todd Moore, VP IBM Open Technologies and Virginia M. R

Re: [DNG] ..the D in Systemd is for Directories: Poettering says his creation will phone /home in future ... albeit with broken SSH login

Hi Edward, El 28/9/19 a las 8:42, Edward Bartolo via Dng escribió: With Waterfox, medit and simple-netaid (Lazarus version) running this is my memory use: totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 3835 8201966 11

Re: [DNG] I wrote IBM

On dg., set. 29 2019, goli...@devuan.org wrote: On 2019-09-28 21:32, Steve Litt wrote: Hi all, I just wrote IBM asking them to reconsider systemd, given that IBM's business model is different from the old Red Hat's. [cut] I encourage all of you to write IBM. If I'm right and it helps,