On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 19:53:43 +0200
Evilham wrote:
[snip]
> This may be the place you reached: this now runs a web server,
> leave this command running.
Thanks! That's the bit that counts...
[snip]
> 4. Edit lib/debian-releases.mk accordingly
> 5. Check if it works with devuan config, b
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 06:42:07PM +0200, Evilham wrote:
> Am 13.08.2018 um 18:39 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
> > On 13/08/2018, info at smallinnovations dot nl
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
> >> I suspect your system is not multiarch atm. You can add i386 with the
> >> command
> >>
> >> dpkg --add-archi
Am 13.08.2018 um 18:39 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
> On 13/08/2018, info at smallinnovations dot nl
> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> I suspect your system is not multiarch atm. You can add i386 with the
>> command
>>
>> dpkg --add-architecture i386
>>
>
> I have already added the i386 architecture. This is wh
Am 13.08.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
> You write like someone wanting to hit me. Well, I am on Blessed Devuan
> ASCII and my system is refusing to install wine32 because of missing
> libraries it cannot resolve. So, it is Devuan at blame.
Sorry if you read that, I just hoped instead of s
On 13/08/2018, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
[...]
>
> I suspect your system is not multiarch atm. You can add i386 with the
> command
>
> dpkg --add-architecture i386
>
I have already added the i386 architecture. This is what dpkg tells me:
dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
_
On 13-08-18 15:58, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> On 13/08/2018, Evilham wrote:
> 08.2018 um 14:30 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
>>> apt-get laments:
> [...]
>>> Can I continue using Devuan ASCII and have wine32?
>> None of that is Devuan-specific. Have you read this?
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Wine
>> --
>
On 13/08/2018, Evilham wrote:
08.2018 um 14:30 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
>> apt-get laments:
[...]
>> Can I continue using Devuan ASCII and have wine32?
>
> None of that is Devuan-specific. Have you read this?
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Wine
> --
> Evilham
>
OK, so I RTFM irrespective of knowing t
Am 13.08.2018 um 14:30 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
> apt-get laments:
>
> # apt-get install wine32
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or i
apt-get laments:
# apt-get install wine32
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required pa
On 08/13/2018 10:45 AM, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> On 13-08-18 09:40, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> On 08/13/2018 10:36 AM, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
>>> On 13-08-18 09:31, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I worked the other way, Apache is able to work with symlinks. I only
>>> ne
On 13-08-18 09:40, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 08/13/2018 10:36 AM, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
>> On 13-08-18 09:31, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>
>>
>> I worked the other way, Apache is able to work with symlinks. I only
>> needed to make www-data member of the users group.
> Eek. Think instead
On 08/13/2018 10:36 AM, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> On 13-08-18 09:31, Lars Noodén wrote:
>
>
>>> BTW I use this configuration combined with a symbolic link from
>>> /var/www/html/website to /home/%u/website. This way it is much safer
>>> then ftp, they cannot login while they still
On 13-08-18 09:31, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> BTW I use this configuration combined with a symbolic link from
>> /var/www/html/website to /home/%u/website. This way it is much safer
>> then ftp, they cannot login while they still are able to maintain their
>> own website. Rsync over SSH is another pos
On 08/13/2018 10:10 AM, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> On 13-08-18 03:31, mett wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 13:18:23 +0200
>> info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>> That part of my sshd_config looks like:
>>>
>>> Subsystem sftp internal-sftp
>>> Match group sftponly
>>>
On 08/13/2018 08:06 AM, Didier Kryn wrote:
> But allowing ssh connections with a restricted shell permitting only
> the commands used by rsync could be the way. But you would probably need
> to forbid the fancy features of ssh, like port forwarding.
If they use SSH keys (and only keys) for aut
On 08/13/2018 04:29 AM, mett wrote:
[snip]
> To be honest, rbash is what I thought of, first.
>
> 2 things refrain me from using it:
> -user cannot cd in his subdirectories
[snip]
Ok. That is potentially a big barrier.
> -the wikipedia example of writing 'bash' at the command line
> and then bei
On 13-08-18 03:31, mett wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 13:18:23 +0200
> info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
>
>> On 12-08-18 06:55, mett wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I m wondering about the best way to restrict a user after
>>> he has ssh'd into his web folder.
>>>
>>> Up to now, the users I had were
17 matches
Mail list logo
