Jaromil wrote:
> from what I understand Simon is saying here, he is not being
> understood really. What he is suggesting is to add a small
> documentation text that, in case one doesn't knows what to choose,
> mentions what is the most common choice in case of most common setups
> (today is clear
I like this one
https://willhaley.com/blog/custom-debian-live-environment/
ozi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 21/06/2018 à 08:51, Rick Moen a écrit :
>
>> My bit of snark was marred by omitting the URL (drat):
>>
>> Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
>>>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:35:31PM +0200, KatolaZ wrote:
> I would warmly suggest your friend to contact the linux-speakup
> project:
>
> http://linux-speakup.org/
>
> That's a bunch of cool people who have been writing quality software
> for blind and visually impaired users under GNU/Linux. T
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:49:37 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20180621174937.37a2416c@d44>:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:35:31 +0200, KatolaZ wrote in message
> <20180621133531.jq5a4lhwzaxbb...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:04:37AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > I've got
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:35:31 +0200, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20180621133531.jq5a4lhwzaxbb...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:04:37AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I've got a friend down the hall considering migrating from Windows
> > to Linux. Ordinarily I'd sy no problem a
From: Martin Steigerwald
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [DNG] When 128?
>From what I learned and read over the years, just about any other CPU
architecture other than than x86 is both conceptually and technically
more sound than x86.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:04:37AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I've got a friend down the hall considering migrating from Windows to
> Linux. Ordinarily I'd sy no problem and advise him accordingly.
>
> But he is blind and I am not. He will have toe doubble challenge of
> figuring out Linux a
I've got a friend down the hall considering migrating from Windows to
Linux. Ordinarily I'd sy no problem and advise him accordingly.
But he is blind and I am not. He will have toe doubble challenge of
figuring out Linux and at the saame time figuring out its accessiility
subsystems.
I have
Hi Adam,
Thank you for your reply.
I think that the pgcli people are more concerned on features of their tool
itself.
My script feels to me more akin to a surrounding enhancement, rather than a
core feature, hence the complete lack of interest from really upstream.
Also the repo is completely pack
Hi Don,
Don Wright writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>>Installing a desktop, by default, pulls in wicd (or network-manager).
>>You can prevent this by using apt-get's --no-install-recommend option.
>
> Not an option within the de??an installer - which was the context of the
> original post.
I u
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:39:51 -0700, Rick wrote in message
<20180621033951.gg32...@linuxmafia.com>:
> Quoting Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI (ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org):
>
> > On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:16:10 +0200
> > "J. Fahrner" wrote:
> >
> > > Bunsenlab has also a GUI program for adjusting fonts
Le 21/06/2018 à 11:34, ael a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
It is time for true excellence again.
It was on offer for several years, but too few understood: the
transputer family.
ael
A guy of my lab used them a lot for parallel computing, in
Le 21/06/2018 à 11:31, KatolaZ a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17:51AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 21/06/2018 à 09:12, Jaromil a écrit :
dear Adam,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
x86 on the other hand has variable size of opcodes, 1 to 15 bytes.
This, by the way, is the bigg
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> It is time for true excellence again.
It was on offer for several years, but too few understood: the
transputer family.
ael
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglis
Le 21/06/2018 à 09:37, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
From what I learned and read over the years, just about any other CPU
architecture other than than x86 is both conceptually and technically
more sound than x86.
I started with C-64 (6510) and Amiga (68000 up to 68060, then PowerPC)
computers.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17:51AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 21/06/2018 à 09:12, Jaromil a écrit :
> > dear Adam,
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > > x86 on the other hand has variable size of opcodes, 1 to 15 bytes.
> > > This, by the way, is the biggest flaw of x86
Le 21/06/2018 à 09:12, Jaromil a écrit :
dear Adam,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
x86 on the other hand has variable size of opcodes, 1 to 15 bytes.
This, by the way, is the biggest flaw of x86 instruction set: the
rules to split code into opcodes are extremely hairy, requiring all
Il giorno Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:11:50 -0700
Rick Moen ha scritto:
> Quoting terryc (ter...@woa.com.au):
>
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:16:28 -0400
>> Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> There was a discussion of whether to retain 32 bit, and that brought
>>> up another question in my mind: When will we have
Le 21/06/2018 à 08:51, Rick Moen a écrit :
My bit of snark was marred by omitting the URL (drat):
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
They're time wasters for folks like you with the intelligence and Linux
knowledge to do a chroot install. I have a little less than the
requisite i
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 08:41:18 +0200
KatolaZ wrote:
> I think you probably missed the point here. believe it or not, there
> are genuinely thousands of people who use i686 images because they
> happen to have i686 machines. The percentage of those in Devuan is not
> that different from the perce
Dear Adam, dear Jaromil, dear listeners,
Jaromil - 21.06.18, 09:12:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > x86 on the other hand has variable size of opcodes, 1 to 15 bytes.
> > This, by the way, is the biggest flaw of x86 instruction set: the
> > rules to split code into opcodes are extr
dear Adam,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> x86 on the other hand has variable size of opcodes, 1 to 15 bytes.
> This, by the way, is the biggest flaw of x86 instruction set: the
> rules to split code into opcodes are extremely hairy, requiring all
> the decoding work to be done twice
dear Katolaz
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:58:56PM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> > I think you missed the point.
> >
> > All I’m suggesting is that on the download page there are the
> > AMD64 images first, then a note giving very basic suggestions not
> > to us
23 matches
Mail list logo
