On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:33:06 -0500
goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> On 2017-09-11 11:45, zap wrote:
>
> >> It would have only these things different:
> >>
> >> it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version,
> >> aka pure rolling release,
> >>
>
> That would count me (and many othe
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:58:47 -0400
zap wrote:
> > You are very good at suggesting work for other people to do. IMO,
> > it makes no sense to further fragment the landscape but if that's
> > what floats your boat, go for it. If you want a fork, just do it -
> > don't make it our problem - and dr
I've noticed that my ssh-agent process seems to stop working with 'ssh-add'
after a few days
or so. Issuing 'ssh-add' from an xfce4-terminal results in the error message
"Could not open a connection to your authentication agent."
Why is this? There seems to be a myriad of ssh-agent processes r
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> On 2017-09-14 13:00, Florian Zieboll wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:39:57 -0500
> > goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> >
> > > You will want to use this 'unofficial' off-site list of Devuan
> > > packages instead. It is on our todo list to add the link to
On 2017-09-14 13:00, Florian Zieboll wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:39:57 -0500
goli...@dyne.org wrote:
You will want to use this 'unofficial' off-site list of Devuan
packages instead. It is on our todo list to add the link to the main
site: http://devuanpackages.viralds.it/releases
Hallo go
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:39:57 -0500
goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> You will want to use this 'unofficial' off-site list of Devuan
> packages instead. It is on our todo list to add the link to the main
> site: http://devuanpackages.viralds.it/releases
Hallo golinux,
thanks for info and link! One for
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Lars Noodén wrote:
> Perhaps it would be of mutual benefit for Devuan as a project to sign on
> to the FSFE campaign to require FOSS licensing for publicly funded code.
> Here are two links, one for the campaign and one discussion of the
> campaign:
>
> https://publiccode.e
On 2017-09-14 05:02, Florian Zieboll wrote:
And, in return, a similar question:
Where would I report a devuan.org link-generation error? I just noticed
that the links to the different versions of the debs under
https://devuan.org/os/packages/ return a 404 as they are obviously
messed up:
https
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:31:55 +0300
Lars Noodén wrote:
> Should I add a Debian repository to get the +deb9u1 version?
I don't feel like giving recommendations on that topic. I just can tell,
that I do have the Debian security repo in the apt sources of most of my
Devuan machines (both Jessie and
On 09/14/2017 01:02 PM, Florian Zieboll wrote:
[snip]
> If not (as in this case) you can stick to the Debian security advisory,
> which states that you should get the "+deb9u1" version before
> connecting that dongle again.
Thanks. Should I add a Debian repository to get the +deb9u1 version?
I've
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:43:54 +0300
Lars Noodén wrote:
> I notice in Ascii that bluez is at version 5.43-2
> Does that version solve CVE-2017-1000251 + CVE-2017-1000250?
>
> Either way, how would go about looking up that myself?
>
> Debian has this notice:
> https://www.debian.org/security/2017
I notice in Ascii that bluez is at version 5.43-2
Does that version solve CVE-2017-1000251 + CVE-2017-1000250?
Either way, how would go about looking up that myself?
Debian has this notice:
https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3972
/Lars
___
Dng m
12 matches
Mail list logo
