Hi all,
If any of you is proficient in Vim's internal language (I think it's
called VimL), and you want to work on a Free Software project, I need
your help.
I'm forking VimOutliner (VO), because the project's current crew changed
VO's main keyboard prefix from easy ,, to wrist-twisting and diffe
Daniel, again, thank you for your efforts to collect diagnostic data for
the Devuan Project, and for your care and precision.
I respect the reasons you're making DMARC work for your domain, and
certainly have no argument with you doing so (though I do not come to
the same conclusion for my own dom
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 03:31 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:36:50 -0300
> >
> > EterTICs GNU/Linux is a GNU/Linux distribution aimed for community
> > radios of Latinamerica. His goal is to be 100% libre and it has all
> > the software needed to setup a "libre" radio including Rad
Quoting Daniel Abrecht (d...@danielabrecht.ch):
> This is just a test mail, please ignore. This time without MIME/PGP
> signing, because it causes mailman to add a multipart header before
> the message, which interferes with the DKIM check.
Not a complaint, just an observation. On every system w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This is just a test mail, please ignore. This time without MIME/PGP
signing, because it causes mailman to add a multipart header before
the message, which interferes with the DKIM check.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQ
This is just a test mail, please ignore. I have changed my OpenDKIM
config again, and added Return-Path, References and In-Reply-To to the
list of headers to be not covered by DKIM. (also, I switched back to
MIME/PGP signing, I think I'll just have to search a better mail client
for that.)
Daniel
Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> SPF breaks mailing lists and mail forwarders - and this is NOT (IMO)
> fixable without introducing a wide open front gate for spammers to
> ride through and completely bypass SPF.
No. it does not break mailing lists. It _does_ break other common t
For what it's worth, SPF, DKIM and DMARC were developed by largely
different sets of people, who disagreed without each other about what
was acceptable tradeoffs, what was doable and more.
The "they" you
mention act senselessly because it is not one set of people. Patching
up email against sp
Narcis Garcia wrote:
> 1. SPF is a friendlier solution and enough for this.
SPF breaks mailing lists and mail forwarders - and this is NOT (IMO) fixable
without introducing a wide open front gate for spammers to ride through and
completely bypass SPF.
So consider that *I* publish an SPF recor
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 03:31:28 -0400, Steve wrote in message
<20170803033128.1fafe...@mydesk.domain.cxm>:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:36:50 -0300
> Emiliano Marini wrote:
>
> > Not new, but now based on Devuan.
> >
> > EterTICs GNU/Linux is a GNU/Linux distribution aimed for community
> > radios of L
Malformed ascii art saying "Don't feed the trolls"
IE: Can't attack the message, attack the man.
Because White Men Programmers simply do not know what they do not know
and take proper, correct, legal analysis from a license attorney dealing
with a relevant issue as "trolling".
Here's a respo
1. SPF is a friendlier solution and enough for this.
3. GPG signatures is more standard and friendlier solution for this.
This kind of tricky solutions (as DKIM) only make people to move to
other easier but non-neutral technologies, hosted services such as
WhatsApp or web-based.
El 03/08/17 a l
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:36:50 -0300
Emiliano Marini wrote:
> Not new, but now based on Devuan.
>
> EterTICs GNU/Linux is a GNU/Linux distribution aimed for community
> radios of Latinamerica. His goal is to be 100% libre and it has all
> the software needed to setup a "libre" radio including Radit
13 matches
Mail list logo
