On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:45:19 +0200
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote:
> > but not GNOME! As with systemd, we are confident this won't hinder
> > user's freedom of choice since one can always go use Ubuntu or
> > Debian which are offering that.
>
> So, you
I have finally migrated my first DigitalOcean droplet from Debian 7.11
Wheezy to Devuan 1.0 Jessie, and everything worked like a charm! Thank
folks for encouraging me to do it ;)
A production server on a Tuesday the 13th (it's the Friday the 13th for
Latin Americans), call me crazy.
The only thin
On 2017-06-13 11:39, KatolaZ wrote:
It would be great if somebody (better if "many-body" :P) could confirm
whether an upgrade from the current ascii version to those packages is
flawless or not.
Ciao KatolaZ :)
Since I use testing I'm just installing it to give it a try. What system
info sho
On 2017-06-13 06:59, aitor wrote:
Hi,
On 06/12/2017 12:00 PM, Jaromil wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Debian has a useful page, https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
[1],
which you get to via packages.debian.org
Is there anything similar for devuan?
https://www.devuan.org
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> Is there a short answer (or can you point me at docs) to the question "what
> makes a DE dependent on systemd?"
>
The decision by the developers to use its interfaces instead of the traditional
ones.
-- hendrik
On 10 June 2017 at 22:37, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list,
> but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant
> here.
>
> I'm particularly concerned by the sentence at the end:
>
> > But I haven't heard anybody claimi
Hi,
On 06/12/2017 12:00 PM, Jaromil wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Debian has a useful page,https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages,
which you get to via packages.debian.org
Is there anything similar for devuan?
https://www.devuan.org/distrib/packages does not work.
Nor doe
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:10:37PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
[cut]
>
> I can tell no difference in any behavior, all dbus related functionality
> appears to work perfectly fine, no dependencies were broken during the
> change.
>
> Oh, and gconf2 (which was also already installed, version 3.2.6-4
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:16:41 +0100, Katolaz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> we have just built updated dbus packages for ascii. They are still in
> experimental:
>
> deb http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/ experimental main
>
> and the current version number is 1.10.18-1+devuan2.2. This build
> should fix
Hi All,
we have just built updated dbus packages for ascii. They are still in
experimental:
deb http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/ experimental main
and the current version number is 1.10.18-1+devuan2.2. This build
should fix the following bugs:
http://bugs.devuan.org/95
http://bugs.devua
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Antony Stone wrote:
> > So, are Gnome and KDE currently still "known to suffer from some glitches
> > due to the lack of systemd" (and if so, are these documented anywhere)?
> >
> > Or can these be expected to work as well as
11 matches
Mail list logo
