On 2017-05-08 10:30, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 09/05/17 00:50, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
There was an issue with backports not being pinned properly in the
beta2
(see: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=32). Or perhaps you have
backports enabled?
Yes, that issue seems to hit the nail on t
On 09/05/17 00:50, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> There was an issue with backports not being pinned properly in the beta2
> (see: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=32). Or perhaps you have
> backports enabled?
Yes, that issue seems to hit the nail on the head; I'm sure that is why
I actually h
On 09/05/17 01:04, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:37:51AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>
>> Start-Date: 2016-10-30 16:05:42
>> Install: linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64:amd64 (4.7.8-1~bpo8+1,
>> automatic), firmware-linux-free:amd64 (3.3, automatic), irqbalance:amd64
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:37:51AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
[cut]
>
> Start-Date: 2016-10-30 16:05:42
> Install: linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64:amd64 (4.7.8-1~bpo8+1,
> automatic), firmware-linux-free:amd64 (3.3, automatic), irqbalance:amd64
> (1.1.0-2~bpo8+1, automatic)
> Upgrade: linux
On 2017-05-08 09:37, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
The 3 3.16 kernel upgraded on the 26th of October (normally), then the
4.7 kernel was an "automatic" install no "Commandline:" entry?
It doesn't look like I manually chose to update, other than accepting
what was presented by perhaps "aptitude s
Hi,
On 08/05/17 23:58, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> I've got good logs, now I'll try to work out exactly when it was
> installed (4.9) and if there were any other packages that were done at
> that time.
The /var/log/apt/history.log.N.gz files have the following:
Start-Date: 2016-10-26 06:43:14
Com
On 08/05/17 23:33, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:10:12PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
>> apt does NOT automatically update your kernel major version, for the
>> simple reason that the kernel package contains the version in its
>> name, so apt would not have any clue about the fact th
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:10:12PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> apt does NOT automatically update your kernel major version, for the
> simple reason that the kernel package contains the version in its
> name, so apt would not have any clue about the fact that
> linux-image-3.16.0-whatever and linux-imag
Hi KatolaZ,
On 08/05/17 23:10, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:55:07PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> jessie ships with a 3.16 kernel, so the most plausible way you could
> have got a 4.9 kernel from backports in the other jessie box (or was
> it wheezy?) is by:
>
> # apt-get ins
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:55:07PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi KatolaZ,
>
> On 08/05/17 17:25, KatolaZ wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:07:25PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > the only way of getting a backports kernel is by enabling
> > backports. Please notice that backports are
Hi KatolaZ,
On 08/05/17 17:25, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:07:25PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> the only way of getting a backports kernel is by enabling
> backports. Please notice that backports are disabled by default. I
> confirm that both the 4.7 series and the 4.9 series a
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:41:06AM +0200, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> I found another package that depends on libsystemd0: sane-utils.
> Would it be difficult to remove this dependency, or is there a valid reason
> for having this?
It easy to remove, there's a configure switch:
https://anonscm.debi
I found another package that depends on libsystemd0: sane-utils.
Would it be difficult to remove this dependency, or is there a valid
reason for having this?
Jochen
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:07:25PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
[cut]
> I don't recall doing anything special to get a back port kernel; was the
> back ports kernel made available generally and if so, was it removed?
>
> I'm not sure of any reason why the older KVM machine would have the 4.9
>
Hi,
I installed a Devuan server for use with KVM back in October last year.
I've set up a new server to replace a different aging xen server (so
also a KVM server to be).
The new server is almost 100% the same as the older Devuan server, but
with nvme m.2 cards instead of the sata type.
The old
15 matches
Mail list logo
