On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:45:40AM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Being on my way to adapt my (jwm/fluxbox) setup to what i had before on
> slackware, i stumbled into this: Devuan comes with evince by default.
> Now, i installed epdfviewer which says in its description:
>
> "Lightweight pdf v
Hi.
I do not know if it is intended to do such trivial suggestions
but ... ;)
Being on my way to adapt my (jwm/fluxbox) setup to what i had before on
slackware, i stumbled into this: Devuan comes with evince by default.
Now, i installed epdfviewer which says in its description:
"Lightweight pdf
Hi,
I am very sory, I can't.
22.05.2016, 22:28, "Paweł Cholewiński" :
> Hi, could You send screenshot?
>
> W dniu 22.05.2016 o 21:46, Sadegh Sadegh pisze:
>> Hi
>> I can't use terminal at my Devuan 1.0 beta lxde 64. I see this " Your name
>> -sad- is not on system.
>> Streng. Please help me.
>
On 05/22/2016 06:33 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi fsr,
>
> El 22/05/16 a las 23:41, fsmithred escribió:
>> On 05/22/2016 04:17 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> >
>>> >I rebuilt KatolaZ's distribution doing some minor changes: I added
>>> >deborphan, firmware-linux-free and ntp... I also removed the refracta
>
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:32:14PM -0400, fsmithred wrote:
[cut]
>
> n/m, I found KatolaZ's post where he lists the password. They are exactly
> what I thought they were, but they don't work for me when I set the
> keyboard at boot.
>
> I'm installing it now. That seems to be working correctly.
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:40:23PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2016 23:22:35 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > I followed the standard settings of the installer which leads me to
> > have root and (a) user.
> >
> > Now, i know there are different philosophies about the use of sudo.
> > Frankly,
Hi fsr,
El 22/05/16 a las 23:41, fsmithred escribió:
On 05/22/2016 04:17 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>I rebuilt KatolaZ's distribution doing some minor changes: I added
>deborphan, firmware-linux-free and ntp... I also removed the refracta
>tools from the filesystem.squashfs, including them in devua
On 05/22/2016 05:41 PM, fsmithred wrote:
> On 05/22/2016 04:17 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
>>
>> I rebuilt KatolaZ's distribution doing some minor changes: I added
>> deborphan, firmware-linux-free and ntp... I also removed the refracta
>> tools from the filesystem.squashfs, including them in devuan-insta
Hi
I can't use terminal at my Devuan 1.0 beta lxde 64. I see this " Your name
-sad- is not on system.
Streng. Please help me.
22.05.2016, 14:48, "KatolaZ" :
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:22:44AM -0300, Fernando M. Maresca wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:08:47AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
>>
>>
On 05/22/2016 04:17 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> I rebuilt KatolaZ's distribution doing some minor changes: I added
> deborphan, firmware-linux-free and ntp... I also removed the refracta
> tools from the filesystem.squashfs, including them in devuan-installer
> together with the backend of simple-net
> On May 22, 2016 at 4:49 PM "R. W. Rodolico" wrote:
>
> The big thing for me about Ubuntu, etc... is not the fact they use sudo
> a lot, it is that by default they do not allow root login at all. If the
> /home partition has problems, you must login as a user, then sudo to
> root, then attempt t
El 22/05/16 a las 22:17, aitor_czr escribió:
Hi all,
El 21/05/16 a las 14:00, Didier Kryn escribió:
Le 21/05/2016 11:35, KatolaZ a écrit :
>On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:18:16AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
>[cut]
>
>>>version of the initramfs), but might be useful if you want to use the
>>>li
The big thing for me about Ubuntu, etc... is not the fact they use sudo
a lot, it is that by default they do not allow root login at all. If the
/home partition has problems, you must login as a user, then sudo to
root, then attempt to dismount /home and work on it, which will not work
since /home
> I followed the standard settings of the installer which leads me to
> have root and (a) user.
>
> Now, i know there are different philosophies about the use of sudo.
> Frankly, is there any relevant difference between 'sudo + command' or
> 'su -c + command'?
Hello
The first thing to do when lo
Hi, could You send screenshot?
W dniu 22.05.2016 o 21:46, Sadegh Sadegh pisze:
> Hi
> I can't use terminal at my Devuan 1.0 beta lxde 64. I see this " Your name
> -sad- is not on system.
> Streng. Please help me.
>
> 22.05.2016, 14:48, "KatolaZ" :
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:22:44AM -0300, Fe
Hi all,
El 21/05/16 a las 14:00, Didier Kryn escribió:
Le 21/05/2016 11:35, KatolaZ a écrit :
>On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:18:16AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
>[cut]
>
>>>version of the initramfs), but might be useful if you want to use the
>>>live image as a rescue cd, and boot into an exist
Virgin Media chose to sell its ADSL customers to the highest bidder last
year (which happened to be TalkTalk) and as consequence of this, the
@virginmedia.com address I used to suscribe to the list will be going
away at the end of this month. Because of this, I've changed to
subscription address to
On 05/22/2016 02:01 PM, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Ok, it was synaptic which told me lxde and task-lxde-desktop would be
> uninstalled (?)
>
> Now, using apt-get i see, it's not xpdf but gpicview missing which
> makes apt lament. Although i do not like it, i'll install it (i prefer
> viewnior
On Sun, 22 May 2016 20:01:29 +0200, Emninger wrote:
> Am Sun, 22 May 2016 16:39:26 +
> schrieb Florian Zieboll :
>
>> No spiderwebs or other dust here... (Jessie):
>>
>> | root@nulldevice:~# apt-get install xpdf lxde task-lxde-desktop
[...]
> Ok, it was synaptic which told me lxde and task-lx
Am Sun, 22 May 2016 16:39:26 +
schrieb Florian Zieboll :
> No spiderwebs or other dust here... (Jessie):
>
> | root@nulldevice:~# apt-get install xpdf lxde task-lxde-desktop
> | Reading package lists... Done
> | Building dependency tree
> | Reading state information... Done
> | lxde is alread
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:42:47 +0200, Florian Zieboll wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:12:35 +0200
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone here knows, why the hell the installation of xpdf (in devuan)
>> needs to deinstall lxde and lxde-desktop-tasks?
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> dependency spiderweb
>
> No spiderwebs or other
On Sun, 22 May 2016 18:41:32 +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 22/05/2016 18:13, Irrwahn a écrit :
[...]
>> I am certain almost nobody would object to that proposal.
>> But it would need a notable number of people to step up
>> and act as package maintainers to accomplish the task,
>> namely to cut do
Le 22/05/2016 18:13, Irrwahn a écrit :
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:12:35 +0200, Emninger wrote:
Anyone here knows, why the hell the installation of xpdf (in devuan)
needs to deinstall lxde and lxde-desktop-tasks?
Does it? I was unable to locate any dependencies in lxde
or xpdf that might form such a
Hi,
Sudo is used to run a command as root (Super User DO) without typing
the root password. Sudo can also be used to run a command as another
user. It can also be used to lower privileges on a command. For
instance, suppose you have logged in as root in a terminal without X
running and you want to
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:12:35 +0200, Emninger wrote:
> Anyone here knows, why the hell the installation of xpdf (in devuan)
> needs to deinstall lxde and lxde-desktop-tasks?
Does it? I was unable to locate any dependencies in lxde
or xpdf that might form such a mutual exclusion. What was
the actu
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:12:35 +0200
wrote:
> Anyone here knows, why the hell the installation of xpdf (in devuan)
> needs to deinstall lxde and lxde-desktop-tasks?
>
> (...)
>
> dependency spiderweb
No spiderwebs or other dust here... (Jessie):
| root@nulldevice:~# apt-get install xpdf lxde tas
On Sun, 22 May 2016 10:34:57 +0300
Lars Noodén wrote:
> As far as default settings go, instead of defaulting to
>
> %sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
Yeah, that's the first thing I comment out.
And the first thing I add are nopasswd commands so slitt can mount and
unmount. Probably, in my case, I sho
Anyone here knows, why the hell the installation of xpdf (in devuan)
needs to deinstall lxde and lxde-desktop-tasks?
I do not understand the reason why (in slackware for example there did
not exist this problem). May be that's an inherited dependency problem
(?)
Me, as a simple user, i would lik
On 05/15/2016 09:47 PM, Florian Zieboll wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2016 19:43:02 +0200
> Irrwahn wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 13:20:47 -0400, Fsmithred wrote:
>>> I have the following file (or equivalent) any time I have more than
>>> one release enabled in sources.list:
>>>
>>> cat /etc/apt/ap
Le 22/05/2016 12:22, Fernando M. Maresca a écrit :
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:08:47AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
My solution has always been to keep users and root *separate*,
avoiding sudo altogether, and to ask myself to wear an appropriate
"magic-shiny-hat-with-green-glitters-and-silver-triangl
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:22:44AM -0300, Fernando M. Maresca wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:08:47AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> > My solution has always been to keep users and root *separate*,
> > avoiding sudo altogether, and to ask myself to wear an appropriate
> > "magic-shiny-hat-
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:08:47AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> My solution has always been to keep users and root *separate*,
> avoiding sudo altogether, and to ask myself to wear an appropriate
> "magic-shiny-hat-with-green-glitters-and-silver-triangle-on-top" (that
> I keep on my desk) whenever a
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:49:24AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
[cut]
>
> Hi emniger.
> .
> su allows you to execute any command, and asks root password
>
> sudo allows the admin to configure with fine grain what users
> and/or lists of users are allowed to execute with or without typi
Le 21/05/2016 23:22, emnin...@riseup.net a écrit :
I followed the standard settings of the installer which leads me to
have root and (a) user.
Now, i know there are different philosophies about the use of sudo.
Frankly, is there any relevant difference between 'sudo + command' or
'su -c + comman
On 05/22/2016 12:38 AM, Paweł Cholewiński wrote:
> Read this
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/35338/su-vs-sudo-s-vs-sudo-i-vs-sudo-bash
>
>
> Paweł
That's a good comparison with sound analysis but looks like it tries to
use sudo just as if it were su. They are very different tools with
35 matches
Mail list logo