On 01.11.2015 14:52, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> It's also strangely schizophrenic as there's no point in zero-filling
> the entire structure prior to initializing its members one by one
> which implies zero-filling the larger part of the second one[*]
> again.
That's called "defensive programming"
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:48:16PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:47:05AM +0100, Patrick Erdmann wrote:
> > would it be possible to use github comments or a seperate mailing list
> > for Netman?
> >
> > Some days it feels like this is the Netman Mailing list and Devuan is
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:47:05AM +0100, Patrick Erdmann wrote:
> would it be possible to use github comments or a seperate mailing list
> for Netman?
>
> Some days it feels like this is the Netman Mailing list and Devuan is a
> little sub project of Netman.
>
> I would be very happy if we find
Hi,
would it be possible to use github comments or a seperate mailing list
for Netman?
Some days it feels like this is the Netman Mailing list and Devuan is a
little sub project of Netman.
I would be very happy if we find a solution for this issue.
--
Kind regards
Patrick Erdmann
XMPP/Mail:
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 23:07 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your help. I will have a deeper look at netman/debian
> tomorrow. Instead of separating the debianization directory contents ,
> I can create a debianized netman source tree and an undebianized
> source tree. That
A netman-gtk3 is coming..., whereas we must work also in the backend,
something is wrong in realloc.
Hi Aitor,
realloc was failing because I mistakenly passed active_wifis which is
a pointer to an integer instead of active_wifi_list which is a pointer
to a list of void*. That is why the error re
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for your help. I will have a deeper look at netman/debian
tomorrow. Instead of separating the debianization directory contents ,
I can create a debianized netman source tree and an undebianized
source tree. That way, users wouldn't need to worry about having to
debianize netman.
No worries,
A netman-gtk3 is coming..., whereas we must work also in the backend,
something is wrong in realloc.
I remember some words of Steve Litt:
[...] What happens when a guy moves from a McDonal's to the Piazza
Navona [...]
Or something similar...
Aitor.
El 10/12/15 19:57, Edwar
Edward Bartolo writes:
> Forwarded to dng.
>
> On 10/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> I was using -p together with -f. Now, I succeeded to fully run dh_make
>> as it created the netman/debian directory. These are the file therein:
>>
>> edbarx@edbarx-pc:~/netman-0.1.1/debian$ ls -l
>> total 112
Forwarded to dng.
On 10/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I was using -p together with -f. Now, I succeeded to fully run dh_make
> as it created the netman/debian directory. These are the file therein:
>
> edbarx@edbarx-pc:~/netman-0.1.1/debian$ ls -l
> total 112
> -rw-r--r-- 1 edbarx edbarx 178
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I am trying to debianize netman but my efforts are still without any
> positive results. I tried dh_make to no avail
What precisely means "to no avail"?
[As I wrote in the past, I maintain about 50 'native' packages most of
which were started via dh_make]
Hi,
I am trying to debianize netman but my efforts are still without any
positive results. I tried dh_make to no avail and tried to manually
edit netman/changelog and netman/patches also without success.
Edward
On 10/12/2015, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 19:40 +0100, Edward Bar
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 19:40 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor et al,
>
> netman/changelog contains this information:
>
> netman (0.1.1~468c97d-jessie2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * New release. Closes: #468c97d
> * Changed debian/netman-backend.postinst
> * Changed debian/rules.
T
Hi Aitor et al,
netman/changelog contains this information:
netman (0.1.1~468c97d-jessie2) unstable; urgency=medium
* New release. Closes: #468c97d
* Changed debian/netman-backend.postinst
* Changed debian/rules.
-- Aitor Cuadrado Zubizarreta Wed, 11 Nov
2015 11:21:20 +0100
netman (0.
Hi Aitor et al,
I am still thinking what I should do to the netman/debian directory so
that dpkg-buildpackage succeeds to spew out the two netman .deb
packages. I think, the trouble lies with tracking patches which I
don't have and don't want to use for the first properly debianized
netman source.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:59:04PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Edward Bartolo writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Realloc uses two parameters: the first is a pointer whose allocation
> > is to be modified/reallocated. The second is the NEW number of bytes
> > required. In the function line 240 is:
> > a
Edward Bartolo writes:
[...]
> Realloc uses two parameters: the first is a pointer whose allocation
> is to be modified/reallocated. The second is the NEW number of bytes
> required. In the function line 240 is:
> active_wifi_list = realloc(active_wifi_list, (((z - 1)/2) +
> list_delta)*sizeof(v
Hi Aitor et al,
This is the working code. At least it worked with an initial
allocation of 1 structure instead of 10. I am using it with an initial
allocation of 10 structures. On this machine the code works and it
should also work in your case:
The code is attached.
Conside lines 236 - 240.
Li
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:11:27PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
[cut]
>
> with
>
> $ gcc -std=c99 reference.c
>
> this is what I obtain:
>
> reference.c:3:16: error: expected ‘;’, ‘,’ or ‘)’ before ‘&’ token
> void myfun(int &a){
> ^
> reference.c: In function ‘main’:
> reference.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:00:58PM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> No, Katolaz, passing by value and passing by reference exist in C,
> at least in C99.
>
Could you please give a pointer to the place where this feature is
documented in the ANSI C99 standard? Because it seems that the GCC
crew has overl
Hi Katolaz,
Can you say me what returns in your system the following command:
$ echo $PEDANTIC_MODE
Is it set to FALSE?
Thanks in advance,
Aitor.
On 12/10/2015 02:20 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
OK, but that's*really* pedantic;)
HND
KatolaZ
___
Dng
No, Katolaz, passing by value and passing by reference exist in C, at
least in C99.
Aitor.
On 12/10/2015 02:08 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
Aitor, sorry for being pedantic on this, but "passing-by-reference"
exists only in C++, not in C.
___
Dng mailing l
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:13:00PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
[cut]
> > Hence, there is no way in C in which "p" and "&p" can be "the same
> > thing", especially if you have to decide to use either "p" or "&p" as
> > a first parameter of realloc...
>
> There is, but not in a way which would m
KatolaZ writes:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:11:21PM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
>> Hi Katolaz,
>>
>> In this case active_wifis is an argument passed by reference. So:
>>
>> active_wifis --> is the address
>> *active_wifis --> is the value
>>
>
> Aitor, sorry for being pedantic on this, but "passi
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:11:21PM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Katolaz,
>
> In this case active_wifis is an argument passed by reference. So:
>
> active_wifis --> is the address
> *active_wifis --> is the value
>
Aitor, sorry for being pedantic on this, but "passing-by-reference"
exists only
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:40:38PM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Katolaz,
>
> (Sorry if i send the same post several times, but many of them are
> being undelivered today)
>
> Try the folling code:
>
> int x = 5;
> int *p,*q;
>
> p=&x; // This is -> *p=5
> q=p;
>
> printf(" The values are:
Hi Katolaz,
(Sorry if i send the same post several times, but many of them are being
undelivered today)
Try the folling code:
int x = 5;
int *p,*q;
p=&x; // This is -> *p=5
q=p;
printf(" The values are:%d %d ", *p,*q);
printf(" The addresses are: %p %p ", p, q);
So:
1) active_w
Hi Katolaz,
Try the folling code:
int x = 5;
int *p,*q;
p=&x; // This is -> *p=5
q=p;
printf(" The values are:%d %d ", *p,*q);
printf(" The addresses are: %p %p ", p, q);
So:
1) active_wifis is the address
2) *active_wifis is the value
Aitor.
On 12/10/2015 12:56 PM, KatolaZ wro
aitor_czr writes:
> I rectify:
>
> p = &x; // This is -> *p=5
Considering
>> int x = 5;
>> int *p, *q;
>>
>> p = &x; // This is -> p=5
it's not. It's p = &x. Afterwards, *p will return whatever value x
happens to have. Prior to the assigned, p was (assuming auto variables)
a pointer wi
I rectify:
p = &x; // This is -> *p=5
On 12/10/2015 01:11 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
Hi Katolaz,
In this case active_wifis is an argument passed by reference. So:
active_wifis --> is the address
*active_wifis --> is the value
Try doing:
int x = 5;
int *p, *q;
p = &x; // This is -> p=5
q
Hi Katolaz,
In this case active_wifis is an argument passed by reference. So:
active_wifis --> is the address
*active_wifis --> is the value
Try doing:
int x = 5;
int *p, *q;
p = &x; // This is -> p=5
q = p;
printf(" The values are: %d %d ", *p, *q);
printf(" The addresses are:
Hi Steve, Rainer and all,
There is an alternative for Dmenu:
http://apt-gnuinos.org/pool/main/o/openbox-menu/
Add the following line to your menu config file:
label="Aplications"/>
You also need to install lxmenu-data. The option " -i " removes the
icons (i prefer so).
I just need also to
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:05:01AM +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> ... "active_wifis" and "&active_wifis" are the same ...
>
> So, forget the comment.
Sorry for the silly, uninformed, and preposterous comment, which you
would probably be better off ignoring altogether, but I can't se
Hi again,
... "active_wifis" and "&active_wifis" are the same ...
So, forget the comment.
The origin of the pointer error, as Edward said, is in the list of my
neighbouring active wifi points.
Now, i am in another house:
# ./backend 6
ESSID:"Orange-F879"
ESSID:"WLAN_74B3"
ESSID:"Orange-
Changing from:
realloc(active_wifis
to:
realloc(&active_wifis .
the pointer error disappears:
# ./backend 10
/sbin/ifup: interface wlan0 already configured
:)
Aitor.
On 12/10/2015 09:58 AM, aitor_czr wrote:
Sorry:
printf("\nactive_wifis = %i\n\n", *active_wifis);
On 12/10/2015 09:
Sorry:
printf("\nactive_wifis = %i\n\n", *active_wifis);
On 12/10/2015 09:30 AM, aitor_czr wrote:
Hi Edward,
The value of the integer parameter 'active_wifis', passed by reference
to 'getRadiatingWifiList' is lost. I added the following line 232:
[]
*active_wifis = -1;
char* tmp_buffer
Hi Edward,
The value of the integer parameter 'active_wifis', passed by reference
to 'getRadiatingWifiList' is lost. I added the following line 232:
[]
*active_wifis = -1;
char* tmp_buffer = scan_buffer;
printf("\nactive_wifis = %i\n\n", active_wifis); /* ADDED LINE /
while((scan
37 matches
Mail list logo
