> The audience of Linux does not restrict to email, browsing, and
office suite, that is end users of shiny applications. There is another
kind of audience: people who need to develop their own custom
applications; these people don't care of look and feel, but they care
with development time.
Y
Florian Zieboll writes:
> Mitt Green wrote:
>
>> Starting from this version pinning
>> (i.e. preventing from being installed)
>> packages this way:
>> ---
>> Package: foo
>> Pin: release *
>> Pin-Priority: -1
>> ---
>
On Wed, 02 Dec 2015, Florian Zieboll wrote:
> Here's a link to the apt_preferences(5) from an apt v1.1.3 .deb:
>
> http://zwischenspeicher.info/temp/apt_preferences.5--v1.1.3.gz
>
> open with
> # man /path/to/file.gz
>
> Seems there's no need to panic at all :-)
I'm reliefed! thanks :^) we do
Hi Jaromil,
Right now the only thing I can think of is a separate repository for
those packages.
Cheers,
Aitor.
On 02/12/15 12:08, Jaromil wrote:
Are there alternatives for preventing packages to be installed?
We need to decide if to incorporate this change also into Devuan.
Many peopl
On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:48:49 +0300
Mitt Green wrote:
> Starting from this version pinning
> (i.e. preventing from being installed)
> packages this way:
> ---
> Package: foo
> Pin: release *
> Pin-Priority: -1
> ---
>
Woow !!
On 02/12/15 12:08, Edward Bartolo wrote:
priv = (Private*) g_malloc (sizeof (struct _Private));
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Mitt Green writes:
[...]
> Starting from this version pinning
> (i.e. preventing from being installed)
> packages this way:
> ---
> Package: foo
> Pin: release *
> Pin-Priority: -1
> ---
> doesn't work anymore.
Jud
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:17:53AM +0100, Jaromil wrote:
>
> Are there alternatives for preventing packages to be installed?
>
> We need to decide if to incorporate this change also into Devuan.
This is not an issue for devuan at all.
Devuan doesn't rely on apt pinning anymore, we now have our
Hi Aitor et al,
I succeeded to run your application without needing a root jail but I
did some modifications to your code:
a)Line 59, spinner.c
priv = (Private*) g_malloc (sizeof (struct _Private));
b) Line 73 commented out (removed)
//gtk_builder_connect_signals (builder, NULL);
Edward
On 02/12/15 23:17, Jaromil wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2015, Mitt Green wrote:
>
>> Good day everyone,
>>
>> As some of you have probably
>> noticed, Unstable had received
>> their updates for APT, version 1.1.
>> It had been in Experimental for long time
>> and now it landed.
>>
>> Starting from
Jaromil,
In my opinion Debian are acting like a commercial entity: they want
their clients to get used to any 'inevitable changes' in their
products. This can also be seen as another stab in the back to
projects promoting software freedom like Devuan.
My 'little' opinion if that counts.
Edward
On 02/12/15 12:02, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 02/12/15 11:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:17:00AM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>>> On 02/12/15 08:50, Adam Borowski wrote:
Yes, the crippled version in jessie requires systemd (possibly via -shim)
to
do its job.
On Wed, 02 Dec 2015, Mitt Green wrote:
> Good day everyone,
>
> As some of you have probably
> noticed, Unstable had received
> their updates for APT, version 1.1.
> It had been in Experimental for long time
> and now it landed.
>
> Starting from this version pinning
> (i.e. preventing from be
Hi Edward,
Here you are the example of the spinner in Gtk3+:
http://gnuinos.org/GtkBuilder/
and you will understand how to use the signal handlers.
The same example in Gtkmm3:
https://gitlab.com/aitor_czr/spinner/blob/master/spinner.cpp
Cheers,
Aitor.
P.D.- I keep asking myself why the s
Good day everyone,
As some of you have probably
noticed, Unstable had received
their updates for APT, version 1.1.
It had been in Experimental for long time
and now it landed.
Starting from this version pinning
(i.e. preventing from being installed)
packages this way:
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
