Le 05/10/2015 19:48, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
From the man page for lpr, I get the impression that lpr is part of
CUPS. Is that really correct? Wasn't there an lpr command long ago
that wasn't part of CUPS? It seems I remember using something like
it in the days of Unix in the 1970's.
Hey
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:59:20AM +0100, David Hare wrote:
> On 05/10/15 22:25, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:19:10PM +0100, David Hare wrote:
> >>Don't know if there is an "official" plan to sort this. It is an annoyance
> >>that os-prober (normally run at update-grub) detect
On 05/10/15 22:25, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:19:10PM +0100, David Hare wrote:
Don't know if there is an "official" plan to sort this. It is an annoyance
that os-prober (normally run at update-grub) detects my
(bootstrap-installed) Devuan as "Unknown Linux Distribution" then
I recently upgraded one my ARM devices and it appears to have incorporated
systemd into the updates. Anyone know of a systemD-less ARM distro?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:19:10PM +0100, David Hare wrote:
> Don't know if there is an "official" plan to sort this. It is an annoyance
> that os-prober (normally run at update-grub) detects my
> (bootstrap-installed) Devuan as "Unknown Linux Distribution" then that's
> what you get in grub menu.
Hi Dragon
True! :)
Cheers
Ozi
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Dragan FOSS wrote:
> Hi Ozi
> If I may suggest..it is useful to keep all lb logs with:
>
> lb build | tee "Build - $(date "+%d.%m.%Y - %H:%M").log"
>
> Cheers,
> Dragan
>
___
Dng mailing l
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Riccardo Boninsegna wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I installed lpr, and it did take a lot of cups off. Do I really need cups?
>
> Nope, especially with a Brother that's very LPR-friendly!
> As you found out, cups-bsd is
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:52:05 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I recall a long and spirited discussiio here a while ago about how
> easy and simple it is to do printing, and that CUPS is a bloated
> incomprehensible system that just makes it all complicated, I decided
> test this by setting up my dev
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:34 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
> Updated *.deb packages of netman.
A little nitpick: the Description: of those packages is formally
incorrect -- it should be an one-line short description followed by a
multiline one (indented with one space, and with a single dot for
blank lines
Hi,
I removed the icon and used text instead.
It is important to note that normal users who have only one wifi card
and one ethernet connector do not absolutely need to use that option,
as it doesn't make sense to talk about default devices where there is
no choice other than the one device provi
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I installed lpr, and it did take a lot of cups off. Do I really need cups?
Nope, especially with a Brother that's very LPR-friendly!
As you found out, cups-bsd is just a port of LPR programs to CUPS.
> But I still don't know how to specify m
Hi Aitor,
Thanks for providing these netman packages.
Edward
On 05/10/2015, aitor_czr wrote:
> Updated *.deb packages of netman.
>
> deb http://packages.gnuinos.org/devuan/ jessie main
> deb-src http://packages.gnuinos.org/devuan/ jessie main
>
> Aitor.
>
> El 30/09/15 a las 17:40, Edward Barto
Updated *.deb packages of netman.
deb http://packages.gnuinos.org/devuan/ jessie main
deb-src http://packages.gnuinos.org/devuan/ jessie main
Aitor.
El 30/09/15 a las 17:40, Edward Bartolo escribió:
I implemented optional use of a systray icon. Use the --no-tray-icon
parameter. I will test an
Hi Ozi
If I may suggest..it is useful to keep all lb logs with:
lb build | tee "Build - $(date "+%d.%m.%Y - %H:%M").log"
Cheers,
Dragan
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Don't know if there is an "official" plan to sort this. It is an
annoyance that os-prober (normally run at update-grub) detects my
(bootstrap-installed) Devuan as "Unknown Linux Distribution" then that's
what you get in grub menu.
This is fixed here by adding after line 23 of
/usr/lib/os-prob
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 07:36:35PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 05/10/15 19:28, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:54:53PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >>On 05/10/15 18:48, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >>>I made the /var/spool/lpd directory manually, since a search of Debian
> >>>packa
On 05/10/15 19:28, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:54:53PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 05/10/15 18:48, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I made the /var/spool/lpd directory manually, since a search of Debian
packages didn't find any package that includes it as part of its
infrastructure.
I
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:54:53PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 05/10/15 18:48, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >I made the /var/spool/lpd directory manually, since a search of Debian
> >packages didn't find any package that includes it as part of its
> >infrastructure.
>
> I think you will find it is f
On 05/10/15 18:48, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I made the /var/spool/lpd directory manually, since a search of Debian
packages didn't find any package that includes it as part of its
infrastructure.
I think you will find it is from the 'lpr' package
Rowland
I still think that something's missing,
I made the /var/spool/lpd directory manually, since a search of Debian
packages didn't find any package that includes it as part of its
infrastructure. I still think that something's missing, (possibly
something that puts files into this spool queue) but now the package
hl3170cdwlpr-1.1.2-1.i
- Original Message -
> From: "Rainer Weikusat"
> Didier Kryn writes:
>> Ethernet interfaces are maybe the only issue, which explains why
>> distros have implemented a solution by the means of udev rules. The
>> way it is implemented is secure: every new ethernet device is given a
>>
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 03/10/2015 09:49, Simon Hobson a écrit :
>> Lets face it - there is no "right" answer to this other than a system
>> with enough intelligence to read the user/admin's mind and work out
>> what they intend to happen - and I think we're a bit off that yet !
>> Looking back,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:30PM +0200, Riccardo Boninsegna wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Obtaining a driver from Brother's support site as a .deb file, I tried to
> > install it with dpkg:
> >
> > root@notlookedfor:/home/hendrik/Download/BrotherPrinterDriver#
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Obtaining a driver from Brother's support site as a .deb file, I tried to
> install it with dpkg:
>
> root@notlookedfor:/home/hendrik/Download/BrotherPrinterDriver# dpkg -i
> hl3170cdwlpr-1.1.2-1.i386.deb
As the name says, that's an LPR drive
I recall a long and spirited discussiio here a while ago about how
easy and simple it is to do printing, and that CUPS is a bloated
incomprehensible system that just makes it all complicated, I decided
test this by setting up my devuan system to talk to my networked
printer. With or without CU
I can't tell from the pictures exactly what the flow is from one window to
another, but if it works out such that you can select the interface from a
list and have it auto-fill the interface name in the window that asks for
it, then you'll have one-up on wicd, which makes you type the interface nam
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:28:44 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> As was remarked already, disks are no longer a problem since
> partitions are uniquely identified, so that nobody cares of a random
> device name.
Some do, when they issue a df command, and the result is a mess of
unidentifiable UU
Le 03/10/2015 09:49, Simon Hobson a écrit :
Lets face it - there is no "right" answer to this other than a system with
enough intelligence to read the user/admin's mind and work out what they intend to happen
- and I think we're a bit off that yet !
Looking back, I think I've "moved" something
28 matches
Mail list logo
